Package Base Details: freetype2-infinality

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freetype2-infinality.git (read-only)
Submitter: None
Maintainer: frealgagu
Last Packager: frealgagu
Votes: 472
Popularity: 1.912578
First Submitted: 2010-07-14 15:27
Last Updated: 2018-05-09 23:40

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next › Last »

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2017-01-12 17:41

I don't know what you are discussing. Assuming it should be the harfbuzz issue, consider just to rebuild harfbuzz

$ sudo abs
$ sudo pacman -Syu
$ cp -ai /var/abs/extra/harfbuzz/ /tmp/
$ cd /tmp/harfbuzz/
$ nano PKGBUILD
$ makepkg -si

does the trick.

With nano I edited the pkgrel, but even this isn't required.

[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Si harfbuzz{,-icu} | grep Ver
Version : 1.4.1-1
Version : 1.4.1-1
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q harfbuzz{,-icu}
harfbuzz 1.4.1-2
harfbuzz-icu 1.4.1-2

Ok, now I see, official repositories provide 2.7.1 instead of 2.7, so it's not in sync anymore with the package from extra.

ebrilo commented on 2017-01-12 17:23

>Ask dobo :)

Looks like he's not going to do anything with it since 2016-11-29.. Orphan mb?

kokoko3k commented on 2017-01-12 11:51

> Will it be presented in aur?
Ask dobo :)

ebrilo commented on 2017-01-11 15:11

>I think we managed to make it work with 2.7.1
>Changes should stabilize soon, please check:
>https://github.com/archfan/infinality_bundle/

I've just installed it (from your github link) - works just fine. I'd say, it works perfectly. Will it be presented in aur? Just to keep it in order, you know..

And many thanks, man! I've already started becoming desperate breaking my eyes with soapy, smoky glyphs, rendered with standard freetype.

kokoko3k commented on 2017-01-11 11:53

I think we managed to make it work with 2.7.1
Changes should stabilize soon, please check:
https://github.com/archfan/infinality_bundle/

Bunker commented on 2017-01-09 12:09

Ralf:

Thank you for the reply. Now I do have the problem that's listed below by nTia89. So the I'm supposed to do the downgrade.

However, if you get p*ssed off everytime some user, that maybe like me is rather new and asks a question that seems stupid to you, you should maybe ask if maintaining a package is something for you.

To explain I did skim the comments, but the one you are referring to, doesn't show until you choose show all comments.

I knew I had to import a key, but I did not know that I have to use the key that's shown as failed to import. That is my mistake I agree.

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2017-01-09 07:19

Bunker commented on 2017-01-09 00:39
>If it is still needed as it listed as a dependency for
>fontconfig-infinality.
>
>It fails building because of gpg-key errors:
>
>==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
>freetype-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key C1A60EACE707FDA5)
>freetype-doc-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key
>C1A60EACE707FDA5) ft2demos-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key
>C1A60EACE707FDA5) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be
>verified! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build freetype2-infinality.

You are completely uninterested to do anything yourself. You are neither willing to read the Arch Wikis, nor to google and worst of all, you are even not reading the comments. I already explained how to import a missing key. Should each user write the same comment and should we explain each user how to import a key? Is this the meaning of "user-centric"?

[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.uni-mainz.de --recv-keys C1A60EACE707FDA5
gpg: key C1A60EACE707FDA5: "Werner Lemberg <wl@gnu.org>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1

See also

http://pgp.mit.edu/
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=wl%40gnu.org&op=vindex
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC1A60EACE707FDA5

Bunker commented on 2017-01-09 00:39

If it is still needed as it listed as a dependency for fontconfig-infinality.

It fails building because of gpg-key errors:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
freetype-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key C1A60EACE707FDA5)
freetype-doc-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key C1A60EACE707FDA5)
ft2demos-2.7.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key C1A60EACE707FDA5)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build freetype2-infinality.

digitalone commented on 2017-01-08 14:31

I think this packet is not needed anymore.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1682116#p1682116

Scimmia commented on 2017-01-08 00:51

Safe? Not really. Partial updates are not supported; if things don't break now, they will in the future.