here is updated version for latest gdc 7.3.1-date https://pastebin.com/GFxKTGnm
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: gdc-git
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gdc-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Submitter: | demizer |
Maintainer: | FFY00 (kozzi) |
Last Packager: | kozzi |
Votes: | 17 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2012-03-23 03:09 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2019-08-23 10:42 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 11 Next › Last »
kozzi commented on 2018-03-26 14:40 (UTC)
adsun commented on 2018-02-20 23:22 (UTC)
OK, thanks for the info. I will keep checking that pull request.
Elronnd commented on 2018-02-19 17:40 (UTC)
To the person who flagged this as out of date: 7.3.0 update incoming (takes forever to build on my machine), but the version of d-compiler is an upstream problem, pending this pull request: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/550.
bernarcher commented on 2018-01-16 00:53 (UTC)
Just tried in a clean build. To build "libgphobos-devel" make still wants "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libphobos" instead of "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libphobos":
==> Beginne package_libgphobos-devel()... make: *** x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libphobos: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. Schluss.
Elronnd commented on 2017-12-28 07:58 (UTC)
Oddly enough, gphobos works fine for me now. And in the Makefile, I have 'target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'. And cc1d is installed to /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Very curious.
bernarcher commented on 2017-12-16 03:51 (UTC)
Did still break the build trying libgphobos-devel. This was because still the "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" path is wanted by the makefile. This needs to be changed to "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu".
For the time being an according symlink made the build process complete.
Elronnd commented on 2017-12-11 21:47 (UTC)
Done!
CyberShadow commented on 2017-12-11 21:41 (UTC)
Could you please change the 'provides' line to indicate the frontend version (i.e. 'd-compiler=2.068.0'), like the dmd package?
Pinned Comments