Package Base Details: linux-cacule

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: ptr1337
Maintainer: ptr1337 (sir_lucjan)
Last Packager: sir_lucjan
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.60
First Submitted: 2021-04-14 15:22 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-01-24 09:56 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

ptr1337 commented on 2021-04-14 15:45 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-15 18:56 (UTC) by ptr1337)

Github Readme can be found here:

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

shayaknyc commented on 2022-01-19 21:16 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-20 16:28 (UTC) by shayaknyc)

Anyone else getting a 404 error when running makepkg -s on this? It's failing here:

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
==> ERROR: Failure while downloading

Confirmed, that file does not exists here:

Any ideas?

Edit 2022-01-20: I checked this morning and the file that was missing from the github repo is now there. However, when I try to run makepkg -s I'm now seeing md5sum validity checks failing. See here:

❯ makepkg -s
==> Making package: linux-cacule 5.16.1-1 (Thu 20 Jan 2022 11:13:33 AM EST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found linux-5.16.1.tar.xz
-> Found config
[redacted for brevity]
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
linux-5.16.1.tar.xz ... Passed
config ... Passed
0001-cacULE-5.16-full.patch ... Passed
0001-lru-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-arch-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-sched-perf-fix.patch ... FAILED
0001-blk-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-pm.patch ... Passed
0001-anbox.patch ... Passed
0001-bbr2-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-bfq-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-btrfs.patch ... Passed
0001-lrng.patch ... Passed
0001-cpu.patch ... Passed
0001-clearlinux.patch ... Passed
0001-f2fs-xfs-ext4-patches.patch ... FAILED
0001-misc.patch ... Passed
0001-lqx-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-net-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-fixes-miscellaneous.patch ... FAILED
0001-pf-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-futex-winesync.patch ... Passed
0001-hwmon.patch ... FAILED
0001-ksmbd.patch ... Passed
0001-rcu.patch ... Passed
0001-zstd-patches.patch ... Passed
0001-v4l2loopback.patch ... Passed
0002-mm-next.patch ... Passed ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Not sure why the md5sums are failing on some of those files. Any ideas?

ptr1337 commented on 2021-11-25 08:12 (UTC)

Will be fixed with upcoming kernel. Will be released today, sorry.

alitajelsir commented on 2021-11-25 07:52 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-25 08:21 (UTC) by alitajelsir)

Some patches don't pass the validity check, after I signed them manually, I got the following error:

==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().

ptr1337 commented on 2021-11-15 18:55 (UTC)

Yes, i changed some stuff at the patches. will be all again running with 5.15.13 push which should be released soon.

Take a watch here for more frequent updated PKGBUILD's

insanemal commented on 2021-11-15 05:24 (UTC)

Ran into an issue building the package

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading

Looks like the patch is actually located in:

ptr1337 commented on 2021-09-04 11:18 (UTC)


Thanks for the information. I could switch to LRU patches but they interact not good with the le9 patchset mostly. Probally just try to change to the lru patches.


quasd commented on 2021-09-03 13:42 (UTC)

For anyone using zfs-dkms, the 0004-folio-mm.patch causes the kernel module compile to fail with following

/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.99.r439.gab15b1fc0/build/module/zfs/../os/linux/zfs/zfs_vnops_os.c: In function ‘zfs_putpage’:
/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.99.r439.gab15b1fc0/build/module/zfs/../os/linux/zfs/zfs_vnops_os.c:3534:33: error: implicit declaration of function ‘wait_on_page_bit’; did you mean ‘wait_on_bit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 3534 |                                 wait_on_page_bit(pp, PG_writeback);
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                 wait_on_bit

Removing the 0004-folio-mm.patch from sources/md5sums can work around this.

ptr1337 commented on 2021-08-31 00:02 (UTC)


glad to hear about that, i also renamed the _use_optimzation to _use_auto_optimamazation , i think its more understandable with it.

I also build on a server all my kernels, so it was needed to.

Have fun!

rossome commented on 2021-08-30 19:32 (UTC)

@ptr1337 Thanks so much! I see the _use_optimization_select= variable in the PKGBUILD. This works a treat.