AUR (en) - linux-ck

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter:	graysky
Maintainer:	graysky
Last Packager:	graysky
Votes:	461
Popularity:	1.08
First Submitted:	2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-03-16 18:02 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 .. 305 Next › Last »

karabaja4 commented on 2012-05-11 07:14 (UTC)

Um... why is UKSM patch enabled by default?

graysky commented on 2012-05-10 14:38 (UTC)

@qcts33 - No need. That flag will make the needed changes to the config for you: sed -i -e '/CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED/ s,cfq,bfq,' -i -e s'/CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y/# CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set\nCONFIG_DEFAULT_BFQ=y/' ./.config You can verify which is your default with this command: # cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler noop deadline cfq [bfq]

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-10 14:34 (UTC)

I want to know if I set _BFQ_enable_="y" and compile the package from source, do I need to add "elevator=bfq" in /etc/default/grub like they said in wiki?

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 19:08 (UTC)

@dkay - no idea on performance benefit. I don't think performance is the goal; more free memory is the goal as I understand it. I don't think the CPU scheduler matters.

skydrome commented on 2012-05-09 15:45 (UTC)

@ryak - Yes, echo [0|1] > /sys/kernel/mm/uksm/run to turn off/on respectively

dkaylor commented on 2012-05-09 12:56 (UTC)

@graysky - regarding the current state of uksm patches, what's your take on any performance benefit at all, especially when compilied in with BFS? @xianai - any thoughts on the above? Do you still have plans for mainlining, or are you resigned to the BFS/BFQ route?

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 09:20 (UTC)

No possible. Needs to be compiled into the kernel at this point as far as I can tell. If you want that code, you'll have to compile from the AUR.

kyak commented on 2012-05-09 08:04 (UTC)

Do you guys know if it is possible to activate uksm from userland (or at least from kernel command line)? I'm asking because i'm using repo-ck kernel (so i can't enable uksm at build time) and uksm is definitely lacking documentation (in English, at least) - so i can't any information.

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 01:26 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I updated 3.3.5-1 with the new uksm patch and again did not bump the PKGVER. Enjoy. @Lawliet - what does the linux-ck-uksm package offer that the linux-ck package doesn't offer? They seem to be redundant, no? Would you be supportive to have the AUR devs remove it?

Lawliet commented on 2012-05-08 08:49 (UTC)

graysky: Sorry, the URL is wrong.. Sorry, my fail... right URL is: http://kerneldedup.org/download/uksm/0.1.1.1/patches/uksm-0.1.1.1-for-v3.3.ge.5.patch