Package Base Details: linux-ck

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 411
Popularity: 3.918328
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51
Last Updated: 2019-08-16 18:08

Packages (2)

graysky commented on 2011-08-23 20:58

@ed - thanks for the enthusiasm but I'll wait for Paolo to post it. I would think that if it were as simple as what you propose, he would have done it already.

eduardoeae commented on 2011-08-23 20:45
Here is the 0001-bfq patch for 3.0. I just made it from the 2.6.39 patches. I guess its the same as the linux-pf one.
The 0002 and 0003 patches from 2.6.39 works just fine.
It shouldn't have any problems because I only made some syntax fixes.
But I'm testing it right now so... just be cautious about it.

graysky commented on 2011-08-23 20:14

@karabaja4 - dunno how -pf is including it since Paolo hasn't written it yet!

Det commented on 2011-08-23 15:11

@karabaja4, the latest BFQ patches I know of are here:

I don't think BFQ is yet updated for 3.0.

karabaja4 commented on 2011-08-23 10:59

Has BFQ been ported to kernel 3.0? Because I'm unable to see it anywhere, yet linux-pf 3.0 seems to have it included somehow...

graysky commented on 2011-08-22 23:31

Guess this is my 15 min...

Det commented on 2011-08-22 19:58

@graysky, did you see my post?

E: btw, and that *is* correct. Even Googling reveals that the only 2 hits for "KCCPFLAGS" in the whole internets are both here :).

Det commented on 2011-08-22 19:56

@graysky, did you see my post?

graysky commented on 2011-08-22 19:20

@feilen - perhaps a typeo on my part in the comment. In the PKGUBILD, I use the following:


I believe these are correct. Is this not the case?

feilen commented on 2011-08-22 18:11

@graysky That is still not what I'm talking about. Here, maybe this will make it more clear:
One of those two is the correct variable to use, but in one post you said KCCPFLAGS, while in the PKGBUILD it was KCPPFLAGS.