Package Base Details: linux-ck

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 446
Popularity: 2.14
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51
Last Updated: 2021-05-07 16:44

Packages (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next › Last »

bryanjhv commented on 2021-01-08 22:05

Ignoring the error would make things unpredictable. Just remove "-N" option so patch will try to reverse-apply and re-apply.

Kr1ss commented on 2021-01-03 11:14

@LucidComplex That would make it pass though also in situations where the patch itself fails for a different reason. Not sure if that's what you want to achieve.

LucidComplex commented on 2021-01-03 10:47

prepare() fails when patches have already been applied. I suppose you can append a || true to the end of patch commands in prepare() to address this.

Kr1ss commented on 2021-01-02 21:24

@graysky The checksum for config doesn't match in the recent release.

EDIT/ Thank you fixing this so quickly ! :)

graysky commented on 2021-01-02 20:36

My bad... git push didn't respond for some reason.

Scimmia commented on 2021-01-02 19:32

I haven't found 5.10.4-2, but as long as linux-headers isn't in the provides array anymore, I'm fine with it.

graysky commented on 2021-01-01 14:33

@scimmia - Please review 5.10.4-2 and comment

Scimmia commented on 2021-01-01 14:24

If packages require that and aren't building against the 'linux' package, they're poorly packaged and should be fixed there, not hacked around here.

graysky commented on 2021-01-01 14:20

At one time there was a need to have the linux-ck-headers package provide linux-headers. Thought it had to do with other packages requiring for actual linux-headers package which is wrong if a user is running linux-ck not linux.

Scimmia commented on 2021-01-01 13:58

See the previous link, this should not be providing linux-headers. Packages saying they provide themselves makes no sense, either.