Package Base Details: linux-lqx

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 158
Popularity: 0.84
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-11 23:21 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 .. 120 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-03-15 00:39 (UTC)

So to build this for x86_64 all I need to do is change KARCH to "x86_64" in the PKGBUILD?

Freso commented on 2012-02-29 14:07 (UTC)

Like graysky's. But it looks like AUR is already in a Git repos, so I guess I can just clone this from there. :)

shivik commented on 2012-02-28 21:04 (UTC)

You mean like graysky's PKG build commits here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911 Or the liquorix patches that damentz does?

Freso commented on 2012-02-28 19:49 (UTC)

Is the development of this PKGBUILD going on in a Git repository anywhere by chance?

shivik commented on 2012-02-22 06:11 (UTC)

Updated to 3.2.7-1. config files are the same as 3.2.6-1 at the time I update the PKGBUILD. I don't know if damentz is going to update those or leave them the same for 3.2.7-1 In case he updates you'll get config.i386 ... FAILED config.amd64 ... FAILED until I update the PKGBUILD again.

shivik commented on 2012-02-15 05:38 (UTC)

config files were updated again

shivik commented on 2012-02-06 22:26 (UTC)

Updated checksums. I should probably bump package version too,but that will brake the sync with the lqx patch...

doug commented on 2012-02-06 13:18 (UTC)

config files were updated, so they fail validity check

Wintershade commented on 2012-02-01 10:05 (UTC)

@shivik - it does indeed - at the moment. I haven't tested all the modules yet (didn't get the chance to do so), what currently interests me most is the open-source virtualbox module, and the module from the nvidia-all package. I prefer nvidia-all to nvidia-lqx due to the number of kernels I test in my free time - although the -lqx is the "main" kernel I use. So when I find the time to test more, I'll drop you more feedback here. Thanks again :) you're doing a great job.

shivik commented on 2012-01-31 20:57 (UTC)

No problem:) Glad to hear it does the job for you.