Any particular reason that shared libs are not built?
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: llvm-git
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/llvm-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Keywords: | clang git lld lldb llvm polly |
Submitter: | yurikoles |
Maintainer: | rjahanbakhshi |
Last Packager: | rjahanbakhshi |
Votes: | 118 |
Popularity: | 0.89 |
First Submitted: | 2018-12-05 13:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-17 08:17 (UTC) |
Packages (3)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 .. 70 Next › Last »
minus commented on 2013-12-24 12:57 (UTC)
frankivo commented on 2013-12-23 09:10 (UTC)
pkgver() {
svn info http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project|egrep ^Revision|awk {'print $2'}
}
No need for manual checking the revision and updating the PKGBUILD anymore.
mtahmed commented on 2013-12-10 16:52 (UTC)
Okay great. If I have time before that, I will fix it but I probably won't have time before that.
I will delay uploading the new version until it's working again.
Thanks!
cbab commented on 2013-12-10 14:23 (UTC)
@Krejzi: Oops totally missed the headers files. Everything should be fine now. As for the merge of clang-svn in this PKGBUILD, I don't mind if the current maintainer is okay with that.
Let me know if you encounter any other issues.
Krejzi commented on 2013-12-10 13:54 (UTC)
Hello, would you care to merge with llvm-svn package? It would avoid duplication and some of us would need llvm-svn with clang for R600/Radeonsi OpenCL support. Thanks in advance!
Krejzi commented on 2013-12-10 13:50 (UTC)
Sorry for multiple comments, but this still misses what I asked for - two header files available in llvm in [extra] which would allow me to build and use lib32-llvm-svn package correctly.
Krejzi commented on 2013-12-10 13:43 (UTC)
Hm, now we would just need clang and compiler-rt built from the same source so we could utilize R600/Radeonsi OpenCL support in Mesa. Would you care adding clang-svn to the package if the maintainer agrees to merge clang-svn into this package?
Krejzi commented on 2013-12-10 13:41 (UTC)
why are there two options() lines?
cbab commented on 2013-12-10 13:30 (UTC)
Updated with suggestion from @oliv.
@Krejzi let me know if you have any other issue with the package.
xdegaye commented on 2013-12-09 20:26 (UTC)
@mtahmed
I will check those problems in r196787 first and then update PKGBUILD
with `svn update -r <good_revision>`. This should take a couple of
days. Nice that the pull request went smoothly with github, learning
every day :-)
Pinned Comments
Lone_Wolf commented on 2021-08-16 11:26 (UTC)
When you have this package installed applications that are built against repo-llvm/clang WILL fail unless they are rebuild against this package.
This includes QTCreator, kdevelop , mesa, intel-compute-runtime, gnome-builder to name a few.
Lone_Wolf commented on 2020-08-22 12:18 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-06 12:51 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
Archlinux currently has 3 llvm git implementations
This package
llvm-minimal-git
packages created & maintained by Lordheavy, an arch developer
Lone_Wolf commented on 2019-04-12 20:41 (UTC) (edited on 2019-12-16 22:45 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
I've looked good at clang-trunk , llvm-svn, repo llvm/clang packages and think this package is now on route to become a worthy successor to llvm-svn .
llvm-libs-git holds the runtime libraries.
llvm-git
The Package now uses a new environment variable to make ninja behave, NINJAFLAGS. If you want to use it adjust the snippet below to your desired values and add it to makepkg.conf.
Incase you are satisfied with ninja defaults you don't need to do anything.
The check() function fails rather often, but I do suggest to build with them. If build fails due to test failure you can add --nocheck to skip the tests.