Wow, thanks. Yeah, I think the -git package would be good too. Usually makes things to stay in sync.
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: minecraft-overviewer
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/minecraft-overviewer.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | Buce |
| Maintainer: | chungy |
| Last Packager: | chungy |
| Votes: | 11 |
| Popularity: | 0.001951 |
| First Submitted: | 2013-09-10 18:07 |
| Last Updated: | 2018-04-22 22:15 |
Packages (2)
Latest Comments
Buce commented on 2015-10-15 17:46
chungy commented on 2015-10-15 06:40
Buce commented on 2015-10-13 14:52
@chungy: I'm not sure putting the docs in a separate package is worth it, but regardless, I haven't used this package in a while so I've transferred ownership to you. Do whatever you wish with it. Let me know if you'd also like the -git package.
chungy commented on 2015-10-12 09:39
It's a bit pointless to have a dependency on git for building when you can use the release tarball. I would get rid of it. Actually, I came to this page specifically because I edited the PKGBUILD to avoid it. I also split the package so that -docs is built as well, and would appreciate if you look at and incorporate these changes: https://github.com/chungy/minecraft-overviewer
Buce commented on 2015-01-17 16:24
@ImNtReal: It's slightly easier to maintain this PKGBUILD and the -git one when the sources are similar. Is there a reason I should use the release tarball instead?
ImNtReal commented on 2015-01-17 02:56
Why are you using git on this version of the package, instead of just pulling down the release tarball?
Great, thanks! I've transferred ownership of the -git package to you as well.