@chowbok Done!
Search Criteria
Package Details: nbfc 1.6.3-4
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nbfc.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | nbfc |
| Description: | Cross-platform fan control service for notebooks (STABLE & BETA releases) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/hirschmann/nbfc |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Submitter: | erkexzcx |
| Maintainer: | BachoSeven |
| Last Packager: | BachoSeven |
| Votes: | 8 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2017-09-11 08:15 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2023-04-13 09:56 (UTC) |
BachoSeven commented on 2023-04-13 09:57 (UTC)
chowbok commented on 2023-04-11 16:13 (UTC)
It may seem like a nitpick, but is there any way that the service file could be put into /usr/lib rather than /etc? /etc service files really should be limited to local configurations.
BachoSeven commented on 2021-09-07 21:43 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-07 22:09 (UTC) by BachoSeven)
Hi @jonathon, I noticed that project, it could make a lot of sense to switch to that, I just havent' done it because I ended up using nbfc-linux (for which I made a package on the AUR), since it's a re-write in C done specifically for Linux, and it works the same way, in some ways even better... But if for some reason you prefer using the C# version, I'll try building that fork and update this and eventually nbfc-git as well (since the original is really inactive I doubt a new package would be necessary)
jonathon commented on 2021-09-07 21:34 (UTC)
It might be worth considering https://github.com/UraniumDonut/nbfc-revive as a new upstream?
BachoSeven commented on 2021-05-25 23:18 (UTC)
@satcom886 I've uploaded packages for the C port: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nbfc-linux https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nbfc-linux-git
I've used it for a while and the configuration is very similar; the project is not polished yet, but it does work for me.
k8ie commented on 2021-05-11 08:18 (UTC)
@BachoSeven Yeah, I don't know that much about C#. I only discovered that it built with msbuild instead of xbuild by just trying it. No big C# build system knowledge or anything. I'd stick with whatever works at the moment (which seems to be xbuild for now).
I think Mono will get less and less support and attention since dotNET is now open source. Might be a good idea to try if nbfc works with dotNET instad of Mono. Even tho I like Mono much more than dotNET.
The C port is a very good discovery, it is still a very young project tho.
BachoSeven commented on 2021-05-10 12:11 (UTC)
Also, I just found this very interesting C port of the nbfc project, which provides some PKGBUILDs. might be worth publishing on the aur since this project is unmaintained..
BachoSeven commented on 2021-05-10 11:56 (UTC)
@vantu5z sorry about that. It seems like this might be due to the recent(3 days ago) update to mono-msbuild(here), but I don't know enough about msbuild to figure out what the issue here; any clues @satcom886?
Anyways, this should be probably be reported upstream.
In the meantime, I will revert to xbuild(although it is possibly going to be deprecated soon), since the package builds with that(cloning this change to -git package as well).
vantu5z commented on 2021-05-10 11:41 (UTC)
Can't build. Get this errors:
https://pastebin.com/r1qp349t
BachoSeven commented on 2021-05-07 13:06 (UTC)
@satcom886 that's true... however the program works fine, and hopefully with your workaround it will also continue to build in the future.
Pinned Comments