Search Criteria
Package Details: postsrsd 2.0.9-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/postsrsd.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | postsrsd |
Description: | Provides the Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) via TCP-based lookup tables for Postfix |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/roehling/postsrsd |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | fordprefect |
Maintainer: | fordprefect |
Last Packager: | fordprefect |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.94 |
First Submitted: | 2016-03-30 16:15 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-15 07:55 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR)
- systemd (systemd-gitAUR, systemd-fmlAUR, systemd-chromiumosAUR, systemd-selinuxAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- help2man (help2man-gitAUR, python-help2manAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
fordprefect commented on 2024-05-02 12:41 (UTC)
No worries, mate. Such things slip by easily!
Torxed commented on 2024-05-02 12:29 (UTC)
That is fair. Built the package in a arch container and it struggled to find make. But yes that makes sense. Apologies for the noise.
fordprefect commented on 2024-05-02 12:16 (UTC)
@Torxed: Nitpicking back: IIRC, both are part of base-devel, prerequisite of building from AUR at all.
Torxed commented on 2024-05-02 12:14 (UTC)
Nitpicking, but I believe
gcc
andmake
are alsomakedepends
:dreieck commented on 2023-03-27 20:50 (UTC)
Currently, configuration fails for me with
Full terminal output of
build()
:Regards!
mezcal commented on 2023-03-09 10:52 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-09 10:53 (UTC) by mezcal)
Hello, I am thinking to upgrade to version 2. In the config file is
unprivileged-user = "nobody".
Should I left it? Is it better to run as postsrsd user?unprivileged-user = "postsrsd"
fordprefect commented on 2023-01-18 13:49 (UTC)
@peippo: thanks for testing and feedback, I implemented the requested changes.
peippo commented on 2023-01-18 09:49 (UTC)
A slight correction: it seems
/var/spool/postfix/srs
should not be created at all, if postfix is installed as well (it should be, as communication between postfix and postsrsd is now exclusively over unix sockets)peippo commented on 2023-01-18 08:42 (UTC)
Hi! @fordprefect, I found a couple minor changes required to build in a chroot and on systems that do not have postsrsd installed, already:
1) postsrsd needs systemd as a dependency, and 2) creating
/var/spool/postfix/srs
should happen in the tmpfiles.d (at build/packaging time, the user does not exist)Other than that, works like a charm, thank you so much!
fordprefect commented on 2023-01-06 21:42 (UTC)
The package major version has been updated, for migration hints see Readme. Please report any bugs.
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »