This package doesn't build, aparently it needs the ext/OpenXR-SDK submodule in the _ppsspp_submodules
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: ppsspp-git
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ppsspp-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | libcg |
| Maintainer: | loathingkernel |
| Last Packager: | loathingkernel |
| Votes: | 42 |
| Popularity: | 0.018511 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-11-05 20:36 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-07 18:23 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
Relwi commented on 2024-04-01 20:32 (UTC)
loathingkernel commented on 2023-10-03 23:15 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-03 23:15 (UTC) by loathingkernel)
@Technetium1 What? Why would it?
Technetium1 commented on 2023-10-03 22:38 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-03 23:18 (UTC) by Technetium1)
EDIT: Accidentally commented on the wrong package, sorry. Please disregard.
Shatur commented on 2023-08-25 15:12 (UTC)
@loathingkernel no problem, here is a patch that compiles on my PinePhone: https://pastebin.com/ZizYLtN7. I did it before the skeleton commit, so I would suggest to revert the last commit and apply this instead.
loathingkernel commented on 2023-08-25 08:35 (UTC)
@Shatur The reason I asked you to write a patch and send it is because I can't test the PKGBUILD on aarch64. That being said, I have added the required skeleton in the PKGBUILD to support multiarch. I will be waiting for your patch.
Shatur commented on 2023-08-24 22:26 (UTC)
@loathingkernel sorry for bothering, but could you add support aarch64 now since ffmpeg compilation script is now in place?
Shatur commented on 2023-07-06 08:48 (UTC)
@loathingkernel the script has been upstreamed: https://github.com/hrydgard/ppsspp-ffmpeg/commit/a94f3e6fa89e6ac5763e6b9d23ab3c4a72bbcd6c
loathingkernel commented on 2023-06-30 09:34 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-30 09:38 (UTC) by loathingkernel)
@Shatur if you can write a proper patch that handles selecting the correct script and incorporates cleanly with the PKGBUILD, I can merge it.
On the other hand, if the upstream script is for cross-compiling, you should first merge the native aarch64 build script upstream and then adapt the PKGBUILD. I don't want to carry custom scripts with the PKGBUILD, as it is outside the scope, especially since aarch64 is not officially supported by Arch itself.
Pinned Comments
xdavidwu commented on 2021-02-09 03:30 (UTC)
Please don't flag this package out-of-date when you see the version string is. This is a VCS package. It always grabs the latest source from upstream repo and version string is generated at build time. As long as it builds fine, it is up-to-date. It is your responsibility to decide when to rebuild (update). I won't bump the version for you.
Also, I am running a daily build service, and by that, I can check that it builds fine daily. Ancient version string does not mean that I have loose track of the latest source.