Package Base Details: python-pika

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: Synthead
Maintainer: legeana (mtorromeo)
Last Packager: legeana
Votes: 19
Popularity: 0.000003
First Submitted: 2014-06-10 22:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-07-24 22:34 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

alerque commented on 2021-07-24 22:51 (UTC)

Can I suggest dropping the Python2 split part of this package? The only thing that depends on it is itself absurdly broken missing many other dependencies, so as far as I can tell it is no longer serving any purpose.

commented on 2016-11-23 14:12 (UTC)

Thank you for tips. I updated the package and added you as co-maintainer in case you need to update it faster than I respond.

mtorromeo commented on 2016-11-23 12:20 (UTC)

I merged python2-pika into this one. Go ahead and update the PKGBUILD. Note that you usually can avoid duplicating the source directory like in the proposed gist and you can just build into different directories. Take a look a this for reference:

commented on 2016-11-22 23:24 (UTC)

I will try to talk with python2-pika maintainer to merge those packages. Thanks for contribution.

commented on 2016-11-22 23:23 (UTC)

It seems like 0.10.0 version supports python3. I maintain python-pika version in AUR and one of package users proposed a combined PKGBUILD for both python2-pika and python-pika . Would you like to merge packages and maintain combined PKGBUILD? Or I could do that if you prefer.

SpotlightKid commented on 2016-03-20 20:34 (UTC)

Here's an updated PKGBUILD for a split package, which can replace this one and python2-pika:

SpotlightKid commented on 2016-03-20 20:17 (UTC)

I guess the reason for the existence of the fork this package is based on is historical. Since the original from and support Python 3 now as well, shouldn't this package be based on it and not on some unmaintained fork?

commented on 2015-04-22 19:41 (UTC)

Hi, Synthead, if you are not interested in maintaining that package please disown it, I will take over the maintenance.