Package Details: qtscrcpy 2.2.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/qtscrcpy.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: qtscrcpy
Description: Android real-time screencast control tool
Upstream URL: https://github.com/barry-ran/QtScrcpy
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Conflicts: qtscrcpy-docs
Submitter: yochananmarqos
Maintainer: xiota
Last Packager: xiota
Votes: 13
Popularity: 0.095036
First Submitted: 2021-03-07 15:32 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-20 16:06 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

DZDZ233 commented on 2024-04-20 14:53 (UTC)

The keymap folder does not have execution permission and the script file cannot be opened.

Translated by Google

xiota commented on 2024-04-10 23:05 (UTC)

@jaysonwcs What depends do you want to change? Edit the PKGBUILD before building to make changes. Or ignore depends during install with pacman -Udd [filename]

jaysonwcs commented on 2024-03-11 14:34 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-11 14:34 (UTC) by jaysonwcs)

How do I swap dependencies on installation? Do I need to change some file on qtscrcpy package before build?

xiota commented on 2024-03-09 21:26 (UTC)

@11D_Beyonder Build in a clean chroot.

@aliu This package does not build with Qt6 on Linux because it requires qt5-x11extras.

aliu commented on 2024-03-09 14:06 (UTC)

Install the dependencies with qt5 swapped to qt6.

11D_Beyonder commented on 2024-03-09 11:52 (UTC)

Cmake error while paru -S qtscrcpy

CMake Error at QtScrcpy/CMakeLists.txt:86 (find_package):
  Found package configuration file:

    /usr/lib/cmake/Qt6/Qt6Config.cmake

  but it set Qt6_FOUND to FALSE so package "Qt6" is considered to be NOT
  FOUND.  Reason given by package:

  Failed to find required Qt component "X11Extras".

  Expected Config file at
  "/usr/lib/cmake/Qt6X11Extras/Qt6X11ExtrasConfig.cmake" does NOT exist



  Configuring with --debug-find-pkg=Qt6X11Extras might reveal details why the
  package was not found.

  Configuring with -DQT_DEBUG_FIND_PACKAGE=ON will print the values of some
  of the path variables that find_package uses to try and find the package.

Antiz commented on 2024-01-22 10:11 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-22 13:47 (UTC) by Antiz)

@xiota This is just about switching the license name to a SPDX license identifier [1] in the license array.
The license itself did not changed so nor did the package.

I think it's okay not bumping the pkgrel just for that.
There's no need to trigger a rebuild for users simply because of a meta-data change that does not impact them in any way.

I removed all the related comments to avoid "cluttering" the comment section for nothing.

[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »