Package Details: tn5250 0.17.4-7

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/tn5250.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: tn5250
Description: A 5250 terminal emulator for IBM iSeries and AS400
Upstream URL: http://tn5250.sourceforge.net/
Licenses: LGPL2.1
Submitter: None
Maintainer: vuillaume
Last Packager: vuillaume
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2010-02-23 22:37 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-01-31 20:12 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

Levitating commented on 2024-02-10 00:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-10 00:30 (UTC) by Levitating)

And vuillaume why don't you fix the installation path?! You can just commit changes to this repository to update it.

Levitating commented on 2024-02-10 00:24 (UTC)

patch-lib5250_sslstream_c.patch seems to fail the validity check

cozzos84 commented on 2023-05-05 06:25 (UTC)

Hi to all, i've this problem:

[user@host ~]$ tn5250 172.16.1.2 Errore di segmentazione (core dump creato)

vuillaume commented on 2022-01-31 20:19 (UTC)

I forgot to add the parameter --prefix=/usr for the configure script. You can add it if you wish, otherwise the installation path will be /usr/local.

muflone commented on 2022-01-29 16:17 (UTC)

@vuillaume https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines

vuillaume commented on 2022-01-29 14:58 (UTC)

I modified the PKGBUILD to solve many compilation issues. How can I update it here?

muflone commented on 2018-02-07 23:11 (UTC)

The OpenSSL issue can be easily solved by passing the with-ssl argument.

However the application is broken and crashes continuosly.

I cannot find a way to fix it, if someone has hints please share.

Apart this I strongly recommend the use of the tn5250j package which is more powerful, modern and well supported.

tulleydr commented on 2018-01-31 22:39 (UTC)

Anyone figure out the

configure: error: ** Unable to find OpenSSL libraries!

error?

OJaksch commented on 2017-10-23 09:41 (UTC)

Broken again: configure: error: ** Unable to find OpenSSL libraries!

muflone commented on 2016-07-12 21:26 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-12 21:28 (UTC) by muflone)

Oh well.. now it's turn of the source package. Its checksum doesn't match again. Using both makepkg and yaourt I've the same valid checksum for the patch file. EDIT: the sourceforge website is under maintenance. No wrong checksums at all