You should probably use the helixbinhx package instead of this.
Search Criteria
Package Details: usrbinhx 2023.10.26-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/usrbinhx.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | usrbinhx |
| Description: | Provide /usr/bin/hx for the helix editor |
| Upstream URL: | https://codeberg.org/kas/gists |
| Keywords: | cli edit helix hx |
| Licenses: | AGPL3 |
| Conflicts: | helixbinhx, hex |
| Submitter: | kseistrup |
| Maintainer: | kseistrup |
| Last Packager: | kseistrup |
| Votes: | 0 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2023-02-20 07:18 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2023-10-26 19:54 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- helix
- sh (dashbinshAUR, bash-devel-static-gitAUR, bash-gitAUR, zshbinshAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash)
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
kseistrup commented on 2023-11-05 09:30 (UTC)
kseistrup commented on 2023-08-17 14:17 (UTC)
@K12ish: There is no advantage of using this package.
K12ish commented on 2023-08-17 08:25 (UTC)
If I understand correctly, helixbinhx provides bash completion, whereas this package does not.
Is there an advantage of using this package?
Thanks,
Pinned Comments
kseistrup commented on 2023-11-05 09:30 (UTC)
You should probably use the
helixbinhxpackage instead of this.