Search Criteria
Package Base Details: util-linux-selinux
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/util-linux-selinux.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Keywords: | selinux |
Submitter: | Siosm |
Maintainer: | IooNag |
Last Packager: | IooNag |
Votes: | 17 |
Popularity: | 0.130574 |
First Submitted: | 2014-01-02 21:33 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-01 17:38 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
B3l3tte commented on 2024-03-29 20:56 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-29 20:58 (UTC) by B3l3tte)
Hello, for now I downgraded this packages :
cf. https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1bm63jj/comment/kw9ly4x/
Plus some personal debugging and tests. If it can help someone out there ... Peace !
MacroNerd commented on 2024-03-28 22:01 (UTC)
IooNag: Ah i had misunderstood some of the versioning as I was under the impression it was on 2.40-2. I can't guarantee I'll be super helpful but if there's any documentation on how to apply the patches and all that, I'd be happy to take a shot at it this weekend. It'd at least give me a chance to bring my system back up.
IooNag commented on 2024-03-28 21:29 (UTC)
MacroNerd: the official package has only been updated to 2.40-1 yesterday (https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/util-linux/-/commits/38076a16943cca34e028ebcb58a8dd3936e9b87c ) and as I do not have access to my test systems for now (due to Easter week-end), I will update the package next week. I understand this lag is currently breaking system updates (and this has also been reported in https://github.com/archlinuxhardened/selinux/issues/121). If someone gives it a try by updating the package and submitting a GitHub Pull Request there, I will probably be able to merge it (and release the update) on Monday, being more confident that it works properly :)
MacroNerd commented on 2024-03-26 15:44 (UTC)
This has already been flagged out of date, but is there a time frame we can expect to see the new version? The recent upgrades in the main repos broke my system and repairing it will take a while, but an update to this package would probably fix it. Not to add any pressure, just curious.
yar commented on 2023-05-18 21:56 (UTC)
The package functions still hard-code paths to python 3.10. Please update to 3.11 or, ideally, test for the python version first.
Siosm commented on 2014-01-02 21:44 (UTC)
Nicky726 commented on 2013-02-11 21:05 (UTC)
xangelux commented on 2013-02-11 20:40 (UTC)
Nicky726 commented on 2013-02-11 20:38 (UTC)
xangelux commented on 2013-02-11 20:29 (UTC)
1 2 3 Next › Last »