Package Details: pycharm 2026.1.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm
Description: The only Python IDE you need. Bundled with the official JetBrains Runtime (JBR)
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: pycharm-community-edition, pycharm-professional
Provides: pycharm
Replaces: pycharm-professional
Submitter: Xavier
Maintainer: Zpecter (Meaulnes)
Last Packager: Zpecter
Votes: 309
Popularity: 1.14
First Submitted: 2025-10-04 18:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-07-03 19:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Meaulnes commented on 2026-03-27 16:37 (UTC)

This comment from @AvacadoCookie should be pinned, IMO.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using Conda, that comment has the answer.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using pyenv, there are 2 possible ways to fix it:

  1. pyenv local system to set Python back to the system installed Python for this session.
  2. pip install Cython setuptools to install the necessary packages to your preferred python installation.

AvocadoCookie commented on 2025-12-14 16:22 (UTC)

For all users with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Cython' or 'setuptools' reported, please try the following methods to address the problem:

  1. Quit conda environment. Now after which python typed in console, the output should be /usr/bin/python.
  2. Try again.
  3. If the installation still failed, try again after pacman -S cython python-setuptools.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 49 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2023-03-30 20:43 (UTC)

Hi folks, I am going to delay the update to the new version for a bit, I tested and personally the migration dialog fails to me, after that it seems to work well but I need to be sure, I'm going to wait for the response of the issue in the tracking bugs.

alorence commented on 2023-03-17 13:25 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-17 13:25 (UTC) by alorence)

I also encountered the error with invalid shasum. I simply deleted the cache directory of package build and the upgrade finished successfully:

rm -fr /var/tmp/pamac-build-${USER}/pycharm-professional && pamac update

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 19:25 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 20:48 (UTC) by Xavier)

@guiastro (update) then your downloaded file is corrupted, download it again

murchu27 commented on 2023-03-13 19:23 (UTC)

If I download pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz from this page, then this shasum matches the file that you linked

❯ shasum -a 256 pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz
50c37aafd9fbe3a78d97cccf4f7abd80266c548d1c7ea4751b08c52810f16f2d  pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz

At this point I figured you were right about my file being corrupted. I'm installing this through Pamac, so I went into the "Build files" section of the package, clicked "Reset build files", and tried installing again. Checksum matches after doing this, so the installation works fine. I guess Pamac might have cached the file used before the recent update or something!

guiastro commented on 2023-03-13 19:10 (UTC)

it is not being compatible.

shasum -a 256 pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz.sha256 8acf48ef44e8309d8625acd9ff21fa033f7d7d9fac2bf6c0e2ef4a6c86ce5033 pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz.sha256

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:34 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 19:04 (UTC) by Xavier)

@murchu27 and @guiastro could you please check this file: https://download.jetbrains.com/python/pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz.sha256 for me the shasum match, I'm starting to think that there are different mirrors for the same tar with different sums

guiastro commented on 2023-03-13 18:19 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 18:25 (UTC) by guiastro)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed charm.desktop ... Passed charm ... Passed ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: pycharm-professional

.tar.gz error

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:12 (UTC)

Hi @murchu27, I just checked and the sums are fine, then maybe your tar file downloaded is corrupted

murchu27 commented on 2023-03-13 17:46 (UTC)

Still getting the same error as @jrohwer. Did they change the tar file again?

Xavier commented on 2023-03-11 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-11 20:00 (UTC) by Xavier)

For some reason (maybe a last minute bug fixes), they changed the tar file, thanks for letting me know.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 49 Next › Last »