Package Details: pycharm 2026.1.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm
Description: The only Python IDE you need. Bundled with the official JetBrains Runtime (JBR)
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: pycharm-community-edition, pycharm-professional
Provides: pycharm
Replaces: pycharm-professional
Submitter: Xavier
Maintainer: Zpecter (Meaulnes)
Last Packager: Zpecter
Votes: 309
Popularity: 2.35
First Submitted: 2025-10-04 18:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-15 20:18 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Meaulnes commented on 2026-03-27 16:37 (UTC)

This comment from @AvacadoCookie should be pinned, IMO.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using Conda, that comment has the answer.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using pyenv, there are 2 possible ways to fix it:

  1. pyenv local system to set Python back to the system installed Python for this session.
  2. pip install Cython setuptools to install the necessary packages to your preferred python installation.

AvocadoCookie commented on 2025-12-14 16:22 (UTC)

For all users with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Cython' or 'setuptools' reported, please try the following methods to address the problem:

  1. Quit conda environment. Now after which python typed in console, the output should be /usr/bin/python.
  2. Try again.
  3. If the installation still failed, try again after pacman -S cython python-setuptools.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 .. 48 Next › Last »

wizpig64 commented on 2017-02-14 01:03 (UTC)

-no-jdk won't let me run pycharm, all I get is a poorly-aliased error message complaining about JDK not being 1.7. Had to remove -no-jdk as described by @madarse - thanks! Here's the sha256 for 2016.3.2 (WITHOUT -no-jdk): c36413a56a8a1d046c84a2c32bab8aaba132551305a5db0845a6c7ed1dc0d4db Future versions can be found at urls like this: https://download.jetbrains.com/python/pycharm-professional-2016.3.2.tar.gz.sha256

dodobas commented on 2017-01-19 09:12 (UTC)

yeah, can you remove '-no-jdk' font rendering is horrible with the system java

madrse commented on 2016-12-19 13:38 (UTC)

For those who wish to install the bundled jdk edition, remove `-no-jdk` from the tarball name and replace the sha256sum in the pkgbuild file. With that said, I suggest using this tarball by default. Font rendering is better with the bundled jdk, and java-runtime can be removed as a dependency from this package.

noel commented on 2016-12-05 10:49 (UTC)

debugging not working anymore :(

jwilliamn commented on 2016-07-19 04:41 (UTC)

Thank you @XavierCLL, successfully installed!

Xavier commented on 2016-07-18 04:42 (UTC)

Hi jwilliamn, sorry I forget update the list of check-sums in the last commit, just at the moment I'm not with my laptop, for fix temporally please change line 4 of sha256sums with this (inside pkgbuild): 43e79e5a786fc76385634dc0a9f1c3489b25031745b840b0822b059fc91d1060

jwilliamn commented on 2016-07-18 03:40 (UTC)

Hi, I got this error: ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build pycharm-professional. @XavierCLL any help?

Xavier commented on 2016-07-16 16:35 (UTC)

Hi @nexero, for me work with both, but I think the bash shell is better for this, I changed it without increase version, thanks for the report.

nexero commented on 2016-07-16 08:16 (UTC)

pycharm doesn't start if I execute /usr/bin/pycharm If I replace '#!/bin/sh -l' with '#!/bin/bash -l' everything works as expected though... The man page of /bin @XavierCLL: Can you take a look at this?

Xavier commented on 2016-06-10 04:26 (UTC)

I have jre8-openjdk too, but when i run the "archlinux-java get" it return "java-8-openjdk/jre", run "archlinux-java status" and try install it with other aur manager like yaourt/pacaur or using makepkg directly.