Package Details: alpine 2.26-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: alpine
Description: A free software email client, a rewrite of Pine which was a continuation of the venerable ELM.
Upstream URL:
Keywords: cli client elm email mail pine re-alpine
Licenses: Apache
Conflicts: alpine-fancythreading, pico, pine, re-alpine
Provides: pico, pine, re-alpine
Replaces: alpine-fancythreading, pico, pine, re-alpine
Submitter: lightdot
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.103441
First Submitted: 2020-08-21 00:22 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-07-16 20:36 (UTC)

Dependencies (7)

Required by (2)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

lightdot commented on 2022-07-26 04:34 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-26 04:36 (UTC) by lightdot)

@jose1711, I completely overlooked this, sorry! I'll add armv7l.

jose1711 commented on 2022-05-17 12:17 (UTC)

could you please append armv7l to arch? compiles and runs fine on raspberry pi. thank you, j

carlosal1015 commented on 2021-12-15 21:42 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-15 21:48 (UTC) by carlosal1015)

Thank you @lightdot I will submit a deletion request for alpine-fancythreading.

lightdot commented on 2021-12-15 15:38 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-15 16:09 (UTC) by lightdot)

@carlosal1015 (edited because I misunderstood) no, I don't think that package is necessary. The patch is already included in this one...

@999cgm, the PKGBUILD was updated after @crondrift reported the issue. I just checked again and the SHA256 digest of the current maildir-2.25.patch.gz corresponds to the current value in the PKGBUILD so you shouldn't be getting this error. Make sure you have the latest sources and the latest PKGBUILD.

999cgm commented on 2021-12-13 12:54 (UTC)

Yes, I am getting same CRC error for maildir-2.25.patch.gz

carlosal1015 commented on 2021-12-10 20:59 (UTC)

Hi @lightdot, this package is necessary?

crondrift commented on 2021-11-25 09:14 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-25 11:35 (UTC) by crondrift)

Can't install --> maildir-2.25.patch.gz fails validity check. Anyone else got the same issue?

Edit: the file has been updated on 11/21/2021 - therefore checksum mismatch with the PKGBUILD file.

waynew commented on 2021-10-21 18:52 (UTC)

2.5 release is out and 2.4 has moved somewhere. I had to update to this:




lightdot commented on 2020-11-04 18:03 (UTC)

@grawity, that's a good idea. I'll include the changes with the next update.

grawity commented on 2020-11-04 10:54 (UTC)

For users of makepkg's shared $SRCDEST feature, it would be better if all downloaded file names were versioned (using localname::url syntax), so that an older cached download wouldn't interfere with building newer versions: