Package Details: alpine-git 2.21.9999.351.d5f1993-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: alpine-git
Description: Fork of the PINE mail client (git)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: Apache
Conflicts: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Provides: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Replaces: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Submitter: yar
Maintainer: yar
Last Packager: yar
Votes: 47
Popularity: 0.000063
First Submitted: 2017-01-31 02:40
Last Updated: 2019-06-21 21:07

Required by (2)

  • topal (requires alpine) (optional)
  • topal (requires re-alpine) (optional)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

kyak commented on 2017-05-03 16:09

@djringjr good to know. But what do you mean?

djringjr commented on 2017-05-03 13:44

Alpine and patches are now located here:

kyak commented on 2017-03-24 18:37

You are right, it builds fine. Got it back.

999cgm commented on 2017-03-24 11:20

Please reinclude all.patch as is having Maildir support and it builds fine

kyak commented on 2017-03-23 15:48

The patched version errors out during build. I'm starting to think we better be without patches. It should be quite easy to uncomment couple of lines in PKGBUILD and use the all.patch.gz, if someone needs those and figures out build problems.

milouse commented on 2017-03-23 08:48

It seems that the correct URL to get the already patched version of alpine is the following:, as explain in this page

kyak commented on 2017-03-22 18:20

It seems that the goddamn patches are no longer needed. I've bumped to 2.21 and cleaned up a bit. Let's see how it works!

999cgm commented on 2017-03-12 08:03

Patch to allow more terminal size in alpine mail composer(for example to use conf var composer-wrap-column=130)

--- alpine-2.20/configure.orig 2017-03-12 03:50:15.841646985 -0400
+++ alpine-2.20/configure 2017-03-12 03:50:39.984646971 -0400
@@ -15763,7 +15763,7 @@

- dpv=80
+ dpv=255

# Check whether --with-max_fill-column was given.
if test "${with_max_fill_column+set}" = set; then :

kyak commented on 2017-01-31 16:07

@yar Why, you don't understand that this patch integrates all the patches, including some of the patches that appear under More patches? (Almost literal quote from the site).

But if seriously, i'm looking after Eduardo's git, and it seems that he will release version 2.21 soon. Maybe even with patches already integrated, who knows?

yar commented on 2017-01-31 02:44

For those interested, I just made a new package tracking Eduardo Chappa's git repo. I hope this is cleaner than trying to keep up with the archaic structure of patchsets: