Package Details: aocc 5.1.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/aocc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: aocc
Description: AMD Optimizing C/C++ Compiler
Upstream URL: https://www.amd.com/en/developer/aocc.html
Licenses: custom
Submitter: disc-kuraudo
Maintainer: disc-kuraudo (ninetailedtori)
Last Packager: ninetailedtori
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.26
First Submitted: 2019-07-13 15:00 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-02-03 19:55 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

disc-kuraudo commented on 2025-11-29 18:58 (UTC)

@ninetailedtori: Added you as co-maintainer for aocc and aocl, feel free to improve the PKGBUILD.

ninetailedtori commented on 2025-11-27 19:49 (UTC) (edited on 2025-12-23 21:09 (UTC) by ninetailedtori)

Please see https://github.com/ninetailedtori/Improved-PKGBUILDs/tree/aocc for improved pkgbuild, including automatically pulling tarball as well as upstream signatures.

Changes have been pushed on 29th, to include mentioned changes! Thanks to all our downloaders and voters :]

R1chterScale commented on 2024-10-11 18:28 (UTC)

AOCC 5.0 is now out

huyz commented on 2023-07-27 04:45 (UTC)

@disc-kuraudo The aocl-aocc package is an example.

Without that conf file and without set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, ldd /opt/aocl-aocc/lib_LP64/libflame.so.4.0 will report some missing libs. With this one-line conf file, this lib can find those libs.

disc-kuraudo commented on 2023-06-25 10:21 (UTC)

Have an example for libs that are not found?

Compiling example applications with OpenMP, amdlibm, etc. and issuing ldd after unloading the module show me the libs in /opt/aocc/lib

huyz commented on 2023-06-24 10:09 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-24 10:09 (UTC) by huyz)

I suggest add a file aocc.conf with one line /opt/aocc/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/, which allows aocc compiled applications to find libs without set LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable.

disc-kuraudo commented on 2022-11-11 09:26 (UTC)

Manual download of tarballs required from upstream

disc-kuraudo commented on 2021-02-02 20:15 (UTC)

Yes, aocl is still stuck at 2.2, used to be the other way round where aocl was more up to date.

I removed the line. Users' choice which amdlibm to link to.

SwooshyCueb commented on 2021-02-02 18:08 (UTC)

amdlibm in aocc 2.3.0 seems to be newer than amdlibm in aocl 2.2. not sure if the deletion makes sense any more

disc-kuraudo commented on 2020-03-08 08:37 (UTC)

I never use that AOCC-prerequisites-check.sh script tbh.

I just made sure the compilers work and they do.

$ ldd /opt/aocc/bin/clang | grep libtinfo
    libtinfo.so.5 => /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f9a5d398000)

1 2 Next › Last »