No, the base package does not serve for providing implicit dependencies, unlike the base-devel group.
Also, this is a copy of the aura-bin package; the one without -bin suffix should build from source.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/aura.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | aura |
Description: | A secure package manager for Arch Linux and the AUR |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/fosskers/aura |
Keywords: | AUR haskell pacman |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Conflicts: | aura-bin, aura-git |
Submitter: | fosskers |
Maintainer: | fosskers |
Last Packager: | fosskers |
Votes: | 166 |
Popularity: | 0.008933 |
First Submitted: | 2012-06-13 09:49 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-05-23 18:42 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 38 Next › Last »
No, the base package does not serve for providing implicit dependencies, unlike the base-devel group.
Also, this is a copy of the aura-bin package; the one without -bin suffix should build from source.
Why is pacman a dependency? pacman can always be assumed as it's a dependency of the base package.
Alright, I can deal with that.
If the package can be built from source, it should have a -bin suffix. As such, turning this into a binary package while "deprecating" aura-bin goes against the submission guidelines.
If you'd rather not deal with Haskell dependencies, a pre-built binary is available in the aura-bin
package .
Is this still being maintained?
aur-git is no longer the same software.
=> Error: Could not find all required packages: haskell-aeson<1.2 (Wanted by: aura -> haskell-aur) haskell-servant-client>=0.9 (Wanted by: aura -> haskell-aur)
@Alad, gotcha, thanks.
@fosskers: Please report spam directly to the TUs. I've removed the comment and suspended the account.
Pinned Comments
fosskers commented on 2020-02-02 02:43 (UTC) (edited on 2020-05-27 18:08 (UTC) by fosskers)
If you'd rather not deal with Haskell dependencies, a pre-built binary is available in the
aura-bin
package .