Package Details: autokey-gtk 0.96.0-8

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/autokey.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: autokey
Description: A desktop automation utility for Linux and X11 - GTK frontend
Upstream URL: https://github.com/autokey/autokey
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Submitter: dark-saber
Maintainer: yochananmarqos
Last Packager: yochananmarqos
Votes: 69
Popularity: 0.000116
First Submitted: 2019-02-12 12:21 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-29 17:51 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 15 Next › Last »

kes commented on 2025-01-03 13:08 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-03 13:10 (UTC) by kes)

I am running autokey-gtk, latest version, and may have identified a bug.

Autokey-gtk functions, but with some workarounds. The bit that is not working is I am not able to
(1) rename phrases within the Autokey interface menus or
(2) set abbreviations within the Autokey interface menu / pop-ups

I can however work around this by exiting the Autokey app, and creating new files within folder
"/home/$USER/.config/autokey/data/My Phrases/Address - Home"
editing these, then re-starting Autokey, which then sucks the new files up.
But this is a bit messy.
These new files are then shown in the Autokey interface, but are not editable from within the Autokey interface.

My file write accesses look Ok.

I can duplicate files using the Autokey menu but that is it.

Anyone else seen this?

tollgate commented on 2024-12-30 09:31 (UTC)

Thank you yochananmarqos. Working for me now too.

kes commented on 2024-12-29 17:58 (UTC)

thank you, it's working, Appreciated :)

kes commented on 2024-12-29 17:53 (UTC)

I am grateful to those who work on Autokey, I use it all the time.

I experience Autokey breaking fairly regularly, compared with other packages, because it depends on so many other packages.

What about the developers packaging a working binary, after getting it working with the latest changes, after a re-work?

This saves the error I just experienced, and a non working Autokey.

997.patch ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-12-29 17:52 (UTC)

@tollgate: Fixed.

kes commented on 2024-12-29 17:49 (UTC)

I also get

997.patch ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

tollgate commented on 2024-12-29 11:37 (UTC)

I get:

997.patch ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-12-28 22:11 (UTC)

@nfs: Upstream merged the PR I applied, so I guess that is the fix.

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-12-23 22:46 (UTC)

@nfs: Yes, we'll have to wait for upstream.

nfs commented on 2024-12-23 21:51 (UTC)

Thanks @yochananmarqos for the quick fix! It certainly works, and that's much appreciated.

Am I correct in concluding that you expect to create a more permanent fix that's a bit less of a kludge?