Package Details: backintime-cli 1.5.3-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/backintime.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: backintime
Description: Simple backup system inspired from the Flyback Project and TimeVault. CLI version.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 299
Popularity: 2.16
First Submitted: 2009-01-09 20:46 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-13 15:34 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

graysky commented on 2023-10-07 12:15 (UTC)

Using an AUR helper such as yay to build packages including backintime is HIGHLY discouraged. The recommended build method is to use a clean chroot. See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot

I wrote a script that automates much of that called clean-chroot-manager offered here in the AUR.

Please stop posting build failures because you insist on building with yay or other AUR helpers.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 73 Next › Last »

coderkun commented on 2013-10-25 06:13 (UTC)

I have a small private repo with a few packages I build from [AUR]—including backintime. But since I’m not a trusted user or something like that, you are probably more comfortable with graysky’s suggestion.

orschiro commented on 2013-10-25 06:00 (UTC)

@graysky Personally I think it would be great if you can set up a repo for precompiled packages! Thanks ahead

graysky commented on 2013-10-24 20:35 (UTC)

The split package is IMO the way to package Backintime since there are common components and specific components with unique dependencies. I understand that it breaks the functionality of AUR helper scripts. I don't want to break it into 4 different PKGBUILD since all are created from the same source tarball. That would require users to download a minimum of two different PKGBUILD files (common + whatever GUI). Is there interest in an unofficial repo to build precompiled packages for backintime+deps? I am reluctant to just throw them into repo-ck but perhaps I can spin up another sub-repo specifically for the BIT packages.

blackshark commented on 2013-10-24 20:14 (UTC)

That's sux. Why don't split it in distinct packages ?

orschiro commented on 2013-10-24 20:10 (UTC)

@blackshark Unfortunately yes.

blackshark commented on 2013-10-24 20:09 (UTC)

Ok.. but I have to do manual updating ? If yes this isn't a good new.

orschiro commented on 2013-10-24 20:05 (UTC)

@blackshark Yes. See the comments below. The latest big update split backintime into different packages.

blackshark commented on 2013-10-24 19:42 (UTC)

Is it normal than I can't install BIT with Yaourt ? I need to perform update by pacman -U...

petaramesh commented on 2013-10-23 09:25 (UTC)

It works now \o/ Thanks !

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 73 Next › Last »