Search Criteria
Package Details: blis 1.1-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/blis.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | blis |
| Description: | BLAS-like Library Instantiation Software Framework |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/flame/blis |
| Licenses: | BSD-3-Clause |
| Provides: | libblis.so |
| Submitter: | jdarch |
| Maintainer: | Chocobo1 |
| Last Packager: | Chocobo1 |
| Votes: | 3 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2015-08-13 02:47 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-05-18 20:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- python (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-19 05:16 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-19 05:17 (UTC) by Chocobo1)
FYI, this is the description for that option:
This is a question for upstream to clarify.
e-kwsm commented on 2025-05-19 03:51 (UTC)
@Chocobo1 I am not familiar with blis and a bit confused. The package specifies
--enable-cblasin the configuration step, does not provide/usr/lib/libcblas.so, but/usr/include/cblas.his offered, resulting in conflict with cblas.Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-19 03:02 (UTC)
Isn't it an upstream issue? See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blis#comment-1024973 for rationale.
e-kwsm commented on 2025-05-18 21:41 (UTC)
conflicts with cblas (
/usr/include/cblas.h).Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-18 20:09 (UTC)
Sounds reasonable. Done.
chillenb commented on 2025-05-18 19:41 (UTC)
@Chocobo1 what do you think about removing the conflict with blas and cblas? This package doesn't conflict with either package because it does not provide
libblas.soorlibcblas.so. Conversely, (as jedbrown pointed out) it's not possible to use this package as a drop-in for blas/cblas, because it provides neither.In order to use blis in my projects without depriving my system of a functioning BLAS, I modify the PKGBUILD to remove the conflicts/provides.
jedbrown commented on 2022-06-16 19:35 (UTC)
I don't follow how this package can provide
blaswhen it doesn't install alibblas.so. IMO, the correct fix is to stopopenblasfrom providingblasand let a separate packageblas-openblasandblas-blisactually install the symlinks. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/71927#comment206301MarsSeed commented on 2022-04-07 11:44 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-17 08:34 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
Thanks for the fix.
MarsSeed commented on 2022-02-23 12:29 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-01 14:01 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
Fails to build if makepkg.conf
OPTIONS=(lto)is enabled. Quick fix:Error details (linking fails with LTO when there is assembly code in source):
1 2 3 Next › Last »