Search Criteria
Package Details: blis 1.1-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/blis.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | blis |
Description: | BLAS-like Library Instantiation Software Framework |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/flame/blis |
Licenses: | BSD-3-Clause |
Provides: | libblis.so |
Submitter: | jdarch |
Maintainer: | Chocobo1 |
Last Packager: | Chocobo1 |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2015-08-13 02:47 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-05-18 20:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- python (python37AUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-19 05:16 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-19 05:17 (UTC) by Chocobo1)
FYI, this is the description for that option:
This is a question for upstream to clarify.
e-kwsm commented on 2025-05-19 03:51 (UTC)
@Chocobo1 I am not familiar with blis and a bit confused. The package specifies
--enable-cblas
in the configuration step, does not provide/usr/lib/libcblas.so
, but/usr/include/cblas.h
is offered, resulting in conflict with cblas.Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-19 03:02 (UTC)
Isn't it an upstream issue? See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blis#comment-1024973 for rationale.
e-kwsm commented on 2025-05-18 21:41 (UTC)
conflicts with cblas (
/usr/include/cblas.h
).Chocobo1 commented on 2025-05-18 20:09 (UTC)
Sounds reasonable. Done.
chillenb commented on 2025-05-18 19:41 (UTC)
@Chocobo1 what do you think about removing the conflict with blas and cblas? This package doesn't conflict with either package because it does not provide
libblas.so
orlibcblas.so
. Conversely, (as jedbrown pointed out) it's not possible to use this package as a drop-in for blas/cblas, because it provides neither.In order to use blis in my projects without depriving my system of a functioning BLAS, I modify the PKGBUILD to remove the conflicts/provides.
jedbrown commented on 2022-06-16 19:35 (UTC)
I don't follow how this package can provide
blas
when it doesn't install alibblas.so
. IMO, the correct fix is to stopopenblas
from providingblas
and let a separate packageblas-openblas
andblas-blis
actually install the symlinks. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/71927#comment206301MarsSeed commented on 2022-04-07 11:44 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-17 08:34 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
Thanks for the fix.
MarsSeed commented on 2022-02-23 12:29 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-01 14:01 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
Fails to build if makepkg.conf
OPTIONS=(lto)
is enabled. Quick fix:Error details (linking fails with LTO when there is assembly code in source):
1 2 3 Next › Last »