| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/brave-beta-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | brave-beta-bin |
| Description: | Web browser that blocks ads and trackers by default (beta binary release). |
| Upstream URL: | https://brave.com/download-beta |
| Keywords: | brave |
| Licenses: | MPL2 |
| Provides: | brave-beta-bin, brave-beta-browser |
| Submitter: | originof |
| Maintainer: | brave-prerelease |
| Last Packager: | brave-prerelease |
| Votes: | 50 |
| Popularity: | 3.81 |
| First Submitted: | 2018-09-28 15:42 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-04-03 06:59 (UTC) |
This package is set to conflict with itself and cannot be installed using pacaur:
% pacaur -S brave-beta-bin
:: Package brave-beta-bin not found in repositories, trying AUR...
:: resolving dependencies...
:: unresolvable package conflicts detected
:: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies: brave-beta-bin)
%
gconf is an obsolete configuration database system. Brave does not have this dependency.
Does this package really depend on libgnome-keyring? I see a lot of other packages has replaced this dependency with org.freedesktop.secrets now (which gnome-keyring provides). This is also true when comparing to the package 'brave' here in aur.
The LICENSE file was updated on November 4th in the Brave Github repository. See https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/commits/master/LICENSE
The new checksum is 239dbc27d68e0a03e92c68fb746602d8183084c9624a533fe92a991b8a4658d5154c901ff64826992eabcf89a5b52cb32f9cf29fd25a42bef2b5d3932010d806
Hi,
thanks for taking charge of the package after it becoming orphan. Unfortunately it failed to install:
==> Validating source files with sha512sums... brave-beta-bin-1.2.20.zip ... Passed LICENSE ... FAILED brave-beta-bin.sh ... Passed brave-beta-bin.desktop ... Passed braveAbout.png ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Error downloading sources: brave-beta-bin
I solved it by downloading the snapshot, then "updpkgsums", "makepkg -s" and finally installing it with pacman.
I don't know much about how it works, but did you forget to update the files' hashes?
This package has been flagged out-of-date for more than 2 weeks and I requested for it to be flagged as orphan earlier this morning.
The v1 is out, and given how important it is to keep the browser updated, I'd like to know if you are planning to maintain this package or not.
Personally, I already updated it using your PKGBUILD, and I don't mind doing that every now and then, but maybe others might appreciate being able to just use the AUR helper.
Pinned Comments
brave-prerelease commented on 2025-02-06 13:55 (UTC)