Package Details: chirp-next 20241227-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/chirp-next.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: chirp-next
Description: GUI tool for programming ham radios
Upstream URL: https://chirpmyradio.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Home
Keywords: ham radio
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: chirp, chirp-daily
Provides: chirp
Submitter: WT5A
Maintainer: WT5A (schinfo)
Last Packager: schinfo
Votes: 77
Popularity: 1.52
First Submitted: 2023-01-22 22:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-27 13:33 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last »

helasraizam commented on 2017-06-29 13:15 (UTC)

Hi, checksum expired.

erezraviv commented on 2017-05-27 03:44 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! The upstream maintainer sometimes takes a while to update the checksum file. If the automated checker finds a new version before the checksum file gets updated we get this kind of mismatch. I've updated PKGBUILD. It has the correct sum now.

KI9N commented on 2017-05-27 01:46 (UTC)

e9c9c4c8318c5bbec8c765e179f3ba389da1181b IS THE CORRECT SHA1SUM, EDIT IN PKGBUILD BEFORE UPDATING chirp-daily05262017

thurstylark commented on 2017-04-20 15:04 (UTC)

Specifically regarding the inclusion of chirpc: Upstream confirmed that it's not ready for release, and not getting very much development attention[1]. In this case, I will avoid putting it in the main package for the time being. Since it's still useful, I'm considering adding a split package just for chirpc and its documentation. [1]: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/2017-April/004565.html

thurstylark commented on 2017-04-19 15:00 (UTC)

Not only was it poorly written (removed necessary quoting, unnecessary use of export, unnecessary file creation, inconsistent/ambiguous pkgver creation, superfluous build() function, inclusion of unreleased software...), it was an exact copy of chirp, and it was done despite my numerous attempts to communicate these exact objections.

Scimmia commented on 2017-04-18 22:38 (UTC)

Muflone, if you look at the commit he made it should be obvious why. It was complete and total crap.

Muflone commented on 2017-04-18 21:18 (UTC)

@thurstylark Is there a reason to have just removed not_anonymous from the package co-mantainers, immediately after the packages merge?

Muflone commented on 2017-04-09 23:10 (UTC)

@thurstylark please co-maintain this package together with not_anonymous, maintainer of the chirp package as we'll merge the chirp package into chirp-hg

Muflone commented on 2017-04-09 23:09 (UTC)

I'm not YET going to delete this package as I hope the chirp and chirp-hg maintainers will agree in merging chirp into chirp-hg. This package has no reasons to exist and the updated PKGBUILD to fetch sources from hg confirms the deletion reasons. So not_anonymous, please ask to thurstylark to comaintain the chirp-hg package together, then please file a request to merge this package into chirp-hg.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last »