Package Details: chirp-next 20240905-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/chirp-next.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: chirp-next
Description: GUI tool for programming ham radios, built from daily build
Upstream URL: https://chirpmyradio.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Home
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: chirp, chirp-daily
Provides: chirp
Submitter: WT5A
Maintainer: WT5A
Last Packager: WT5A
Votes: 74
Popularity: 2.94
First Submitted: 2023-01-22 22:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-06 16:02 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

petris commented on 2018-02-01 01:18 (UTC)

Thank you!

erezraviv commented on 2018-02-01 01:06 (UTC)

oops. Comma removed

petris commented on 2018-01-31 22:28 (UTC)

The comma between pygtk and python2-suds needs to be removed to build correctly.

erezraviv commented on 2018-01-31 02:23 (UTC)

Good catch. I'll add it

m3thodic commented on 2018-01-30 19:46 (UTC)

FYI importing remote data sources (ie: radioreference.com) requires python-suds or python2-suds -- I just installed both:

Suds library required for RadioReference.com import. Try installing your distribution's python-suds package.

helasraizam commented on 2017-06-29 13:15 (UTC)

Hi, checksum expired.

erezraviv commented on 2017-05-27 03:44 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! The upstream maintainer sometimes takes a while to update the checksum file. If the automated checker finds a new version before the checksum file gets updated we get this kind of mismatch. I've updated PKGBUILD. It has the correct sum now.

KI9N commented on 2017-05-27 01:46 (UTC)

e9c9c4c8318c5bbec8c765e179f3ba389da1181b IS THE CORRECT SHA1SUM, EDIT IN PKGBUILD BEFORE UPDATING chirp-daily05262017

thurstylark commented on 2017-04-20 15:04 (UTC)

Specifically regarding the inclusion of chirpc: Upstream confirmed that it's not ready for release, and not getting very much development attention[1]. In this case, I will avoid putting it in the main package for the time being. Since it's still useful, I'm considering adding a split package just for chirpc and its documentation. [1]: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/2017-April/004565.html

thurstylark commented on 2017-04-19 15:00 (UTC)

Not only was it poorly written (removed necessary quoting, unnecessary use of export, unnecessary file creation, inconsistent/ambiguous pkgver creation, superfluous build() function, inclusion of unreleased software...), it was an exact copy of chirp, and it was done despite my numerous attempts to communicate these exact objections.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »