Package Details: chromium-dev 126.0.6423.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/chromium-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: chromium-dev
Description: The open-source project behind Google Chrome (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL: http://www.chromium.org
Keywords: browser web
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: None
Maintainer: sl1pkn07
Last Packager: sl1pkn07
Votes: 160
Popularity: 0.23
First Submitted: 2010-05-17 09:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-21 19:18 (UTC)

Required by (0)

Sources (13)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 .. 152 Next › Last »

Malix commented on 2010-09-12 20:24 (UTC)

@dcelasun I'd guess it took roughly 20 minutes or so on a phenom2 945, using MAKEFLAGS="-j4" in /etc/makepkg.conf

dcelasun commented on 2010-09-12 20:20 (UTC)

Quick question, how long did it take for you to compile this? On what hardware? It's been a while since I started it and I wonder if, somewhere, I did something wrong.

thermionix commented on 2010-09-11 00:42 (UTC)

Just modified the pkgbuild, don't know if anyones interested. This re-enables phantom tabs, a great feature which was removed recently http://pastebin.com/AaWMx1qX -pkgbuild http://pastebin.com/uiAAc5PV -patch

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-09-05 14:34 (UTC)

@joint007 Try to upgrade gcc to 4.5.1-6 and rebuild the package: $ rm -rf src $ makepkg -s -f I also recommend to disable custom CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS if you are using any.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-09-05 14:23 (UTC)

@mvorozhtsov This is second time build for this version chromium. gcc version is 4.5.0-6.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-09-05 13:54 (UTC)

@joint007 Looks like http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=52748 but that bug is already fixed in the current version. What version of gcc are you using? Your log is rather short, did you build from scratch (i.e. no src dir)?

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-09-05 12:18 (UTC)

Hello, i have a problem: http://pastebin.com/jZwZYnsg Ideas?(sorry for my very bad english)

jackoneill commented on 2010-09-01 08:26 (UTC)

@ViOLO: I see, thanks.

Vi0L0 commented on 2010-09-01 01:10 (UTC)

@cantabile: i tested only with .509, but Gillian00 said it's working fine with .503 : https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818805#p818805

jackoneill commented on 2010-08-31 20:13 (UTC)

@ViOLO: In that bbs post you offer a source tarball for version 7.0.508; is it necessary to use _that_ version (or higher) or will this one (7.0.503) work as well?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 .. 152 Next › Last »