Package Details: clion-eap-lldb 243.21565.238-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/clion-eap.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: clion-eap
Description: JetBrains packaged LLVM Debugger for CLion EAP
Upstream URL: http://www.jetbrains.com/clion
Keywords: C C++ IDE JetBrains
Licenses: custom
Submitter: rdoursenaud
Maintainer: Zrax
Last Packager: Zrax
Votes: 60
Popularity: 0.027451
First Submitted: 2014-09-08 12:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-20 16:26 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

rdoursenaud commented on 2014-10-26 15:56 (UTC)

@Pete, well, I didn't because it's automatically creating one at first launch.

Pete commented on 2014-10-26 14:53 (UTC)

Great to see clion! Would you be willing to add a .desktop file (like e.g. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm-professional has)?

rdoursenaud commented on 2014-10-26 14:18 (UTC)

@FFTC56 thanks for your comments. I have removed the cmake dep and made gdb optional since there is also a bundled version. lib32-glibc and python are needed for this gdb version according to namcap output, so I'm keeping those.

intgr commented on 2014-10-05 11:14 (UTC)

New version out... pkgbuild=138.2344.17 sha512sums=('28b75df0780b0561979d015350a4ee3191016a4379341473123fbbf072028df0f4f27b483abe019785b42ac0c16ecf2cf2996a2ce72fcaf60cfdd6ce7958b1da') PS: Why on Earth are you storing the version in $pkgbuild not $pkgver?

peterhu commented on 2014-10-01 22:05 (UTC)

editors/clion-eap appears to have already updated to the new build. Any word when we'll get devel/clion (which is more generically named) package updated?

rdoursenaud commented on 2014-09-20 13:10 (UTC)

@farwayer Updated, thanks

farwayer commented on 2014-09-20 12:29 (UTC)

There is need to set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 to prevent include errors on none en_US systems. http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-170#comment=27-795371

farwayer commented on 2014-09-20 12:29 (UTC)

There is need to set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 to prevent include errors on none en_US systems. http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-170#comment=27-795371

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7