Package Details: conan 2.9.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/conan.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: conan
Description: A distributed, open source, C/C++ package manager.
Upstream URL: https://conan.io
Keywords: conan
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: conan1
Provides: conan
Submitter: suridaj
Maintainer: suridaj
Last Packager: suridaj
Votes: 74
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2016-08-21 01:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-04 18:34 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

cguenther commented on 2016-12-05 13:43 (UTC)

@suridaj why does not exist anymore the dependency to the python-passlib?

suridaj commented on 2016-12-01 12:40 (UTC)

@zerophase, thank you for reporting. Conan 0.16.0 passes all tests with the new passlib 1.7.0 as can be seen here: https://travis-ci.org/tivek/conan/jobs/180378979 Please check the new PKGBUILD and let me know if there are any problems.

zerophase commented on 2016-12-01 12:11 (UTC)

python-passlib has been updated to 1.7.0 on arch.

suridaj commented on 2016-11-26 02:30 (UTC)

Conan 0.15.0 tests fine with python-requests 2.12.1. The new PKGBUILD is up and a pull request is sent upstream.

suridaj commented on 2016-11-25 16:18 (UTC)

@xaver, thank you for the report. I will test conan 0.15.0 with the most recent python-requests and upload a new PKGBUILD.

xaver commented on 2016-11-24 17:45 (UTC)

conan: installing python-requests (2.12.1-1) breaks dependency 'python-requests<2.12.0'

suridaj commented on 2016-10-18 06:12 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I ran conan's test suite agains boto 2.43 with no problems. The updated PKGBUILD is here and I've also submitted a pull request upstream.

zerophase commented on 2016-10-18 04:58 (UTC)

python-boto 2.43 just came out. Will this package work fine with the current version?

suridaj commented on 2016-10-06 11:33 (UTC)

Thanks @flisboac, the AUR dependency resolution should now work with yaourt.

suridaj commented on 2016-09-28 21:15 (UTC) (edited on 2016-09-28 21:15 (UTC) by suridaj)

Hi @flisboac. I am on the road until the end of the week and unable to test your suggestion. I would rather that python-fasteners depends on python-monothonic than pushing this dep up the chain to conan. Of course when I get to Arch machine I will be sure to test this. In the meantime it would be of great help if you could test whether just pulling the conan package from AUR as is using pacman works. Namely, there is a yaourt bug that prevents it to resolve AUR dependencies of AUR packages (see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=207502) so we need to see which of the two possibilities is the culprit.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »