Package Details: conduit 0.7.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/conduit.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: conduit
Description: Simple, fast and reliable chat server powered by Matrix
Upstream URL: https://conduit.rs/
Keywords: chat conduit matrix rust
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: ZenTauro
Maintainer: AlphaJack
Last Packager: AlphaJack
Votes: 13
Popularity: 0.56
First Submitted: 2021-10-05 17:38 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-24 23:12 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

apropos commented on 2024-02-13 19:58 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with b2sums...
    conduit ... Skipped
    conduit.service ... FAILED
    conduit.sysusers ... Passed
    conduit.tmpfiles ... Passed
    conduit.toml ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
error: failed to build 'conduit'

obj_Obj commented on 2024-01-23 17:36 (UTC)

remove the check step, it adds a lot of extra compile time especially on low spec machines

girlbossceo commented on 2023-12-28 22:58 (UTC)

Removed DynamicUser, the UX seems too weird for use in a public AUR package.

matkam commented on 2023-12-28 20:07 (UTC)

Yes removing DynamicUser should work. TBH I’m not sure how to use DynamicUser, but I imagine you could instead keep it, and remove the conduit.sysusers file and fix conduit.tmpfiles accordingly.

girlbossceo commented on 2023-12-28 16:28 (UTC)

Is the fix just removing DynamicUser? I used the Debian systemd unit and just modified it a bit. I tested this on my machine and it seemed to have worked just fine so.

matkam commented on 2023-12-28 06:12 (UTC)

The conduit.service has DynamicUser=yes, which makes it so the service does not start as the conduit-matrix user, and permissions do not match what's in conduit.tmpfiles.

girlbossceo commented on 2023-11-27 18:26 (UTC)

Is this still actually maintained? There have not been any changes to this package since September 18, the same day the original maintainer disowned it. It still does not build due to all features being built since September and unable to be used.

If no one is maintaining this then I'd like to pick it up. Hoping the current maintainer sees this since there is no public email listed to contact them.

bjo commented on 2023-10-31 07:59 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-31 08:00 (UTC) by bjo)

Timo said now: they should not compile with all features, because this includes some broken testing code