Arch Linux User Repository

Does't build. The error produced:

romcc.c: In function ‘register_builtin_macros’: romcc.c:3645:20: error: ‘"’ directive writing 1 byte into a region of size between 0 and 29 [-Werror=format-overflow=] sprintf(buf, "\"%s\"", scratch); ^~ romcc.c:3645:2: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 3 and 32 bytes into a destination of size 30 sprintf(buf, "\"%s\"", scratch); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ romcc.c:3649:20: error: ‘"’ directive writing 1 byte into a region of size between 0 and 29 [-Werror=format-overflow=] sprintf(buf, "\"%s\"", scratch); ^~ romcc.c:3649:2: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 3 and 32 bytes into a destination of size 30 sprintf(buf, "\"%s\"", scratch); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make: *** [<builtin>: romcc] Error 1 make: Leaving directory '/tmp/tmp.I8RChOB7pS/coreboot-utils-git/src/coreboot/util/romcc' ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting..</builtin>

This package conflicts with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/me_cleaner-git/

Is me_cleaner need to be part of this package at all? It comes from https://githib.com/corna/me_cleaner and not from https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot

Consider using me_cleaner from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/me_cleaner-git/

Why the specific commit of me_cleaner? I submitted an me_cleaner-git package to the AUR before realizing it was a part of this package.

You're a number of commits behind at this point: See https://github.com/corna/me_cleaner/compare/312ef02714dcab806c9d9bfee07f51002dc61e08...master

I'd recommend either removing it from this package, or cloning the Git repo and including an up-to-date version.

mytbk, I added you as a comaintainer. Please add your improvements. I would personally keep romcc unless it hurts.

I think intelmetool can also be added, and we don't need romcc which is only used to compile coreboot pre-CAR/pre-RAM code.

Besides, we don't need the submodules blobs, vboot, ATF, etc. to build these utils.

blobs repo is not needed - not used for anything, package is created fine without downloading that repo

In addition to missing coreboot's ectool, intelutil is missing man page ( util/inteltool/inteltool.8 )

so now it's a bit weird, it's a coreboot tool (util/ectool/) .
ChromeOS is ofc using coreboot...
EDIT: coreboot and chromeos `ectool` are different things, they even have different license

swiftgeek, there is already a package for it:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromeos-ecutil-git/