I can suggest you to build the package from sources, if you can.
@synthead left you a PKGBUILD in the past (not tested from me).
Search Criteria
Package Details: discord-chat-exporter-cli 2.43.3-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/discord-chat-exporter-cli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | discord-chat-exporter-cli |
| Description: | Exports Discord chat logs to a file (Command-line interface only) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/Tyrrrz/DiscordChatExporter |
| Keywords: | archival archiver chat discord export logger |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Submitter: | Pegasis |
| Maintainer: | atticf |
| Last Packager: | atticf |
| Votes: | 22 |
| Popularity: | 0.007900 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-09-20 05:19 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-05-26 22:43 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- dotnet-runtime-8.0 (dotnet-runtime-binAUR, dotnet-runtime)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- sh (dashbinshAUR, bash-devel-static-gitAUR, zshbinshAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR, bash)
- aspnet-runtime (aspnet-runtime-3.0AUR, aspnet-runtime-2.1AUR, aspnet-runtime-2.2AUR, aspnet-runtime-5.0-binAUR, aspnet-runtime-7.0-binAUR, aspnet-runtime-6.0-binAUR, aspnet-runtime-binAUR, aspnet-runtime-preview-binAUR) (make)
- dotnet-sdk-8.0 (dotnet-sdk-binAUR, dotnet-sdk) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (2)
Muflone commented on 2023-11-21 13:21 (UTC)
Pegasis commented on 2023-11-21 13:16 (UTC)
@muflone
Looks like you are more experienced than me on arch linux, what do you think is the best action to take here?
Muflone commented on 2023-11-21 13:14 (UTC)
@Pegasis the Java exception is not applicable to .NET applications
The linked page you just posted has an hyperlink on the Java word explaining why Java is partially exempted, as building Java applications can be a mess to package and tends to be complex applications
What you prefer to do with package?
Pegasis commented on 2023-11-21 12:53 (UTC)
@muflone
I did not suffix this package with -bin because the AUR submission guidelines wrotes:
Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix. An exception to this is with Java.
.Net and Java are similar in a sense that they compile to some form of intermediate representation, not a "binary" that can execute by itself. So I believe the exception to Java is also applicable to .Net
Pegasis commented on 2023-11-21 12:52 (UTC)
@cgarz
Please create another package under the new name.
Pegasis commented on 2023-11-21 12:51 (UTC)
Hi @muflone
Please see https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/discord-chat-exporter-cli#comment-840428 for the justification behind the name.
The AUR guidelines does not make clear what the package name for a build-from-source package for a java-like-language should be.
Also, the new version of the package requires dotnet 8, which havent been updated for arch linux. I'll update the package after dotnet 8 is there.
Muflone commented on 2023-11-21 12:35 (UTC)
@Pegasis
This package is a binary package, so it should be named *-bin
Also there's a newer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/discordchatexporter-cli package which builds from the sources.
We have a chance to merge this package moving the votes and comments into that.
The alternative would be you build this package from sources instead of binary files.
If not we have to merge this package and create another with *-bin suffix
Please answer me within 10 days
eclairevoyant commented on 2023-06-27 06:10 (UTC)
license should be GPL3 here
cgarz commented on 2023-05-20 19:12 (UTC)
Any chance to switch upstream to https://github.com/nulldg/DiscordChatExporterPlus ?
It's identical apart from the removal of the political bloat and addition of plus in some places.
Pinned Comments