Search Criteria
Package Details: dogecoin-qt 1.14.8-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/dogecoin-qt.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | dogecoin-qt |
Description: | Cryptocurrency |
Upstream URL: | http://dogecoin.com/ |
Licenses: | MIT |
Provides: | dogecoin-cli, dogecoin-daemon, dogecoin-tx |
Submitter: | Thermi |
Maintainer: | mauritiusdadd |
Last Packager: | mauritiusdadd |
Votes: | 52 |
Popularity: | 1.28 |
First Submitted: | 2014-02-01 16:57 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 16:23 (UTC) |
Dependencies (17)
- boost-libs
- db
- libevent (libevent-gitAUR)
- miniupnpc (miniupnpc-gitAUR)
- openssl (openssl-gitAUR, openssl-staticAUR)
- protobuf (protobuf-gitAUR)
- qt5-base (qt5-base-gitAUR, qt5-base-headlessAUR)
- boost (boost-gitAUR) (make)
- boost-libs (make)
- db (make)
- gcc (gcc-gitAUR, gccrs-gitAUR, gcc11AUR, gcc-snapshotAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- make (make-gitAUR) (make)
- miniupnpc (miniupnpc-gitAUR) (make)
- openssl (openssl-gitAUR, openssl-staticAUR) (make)
- protobuf (protobuf-gitAUR) (make)
- qt5-tools (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »
mauritiusdadd commented on 2024-11-16 16:26 (UTC)
I just adopted the package and updated it to the latest available version (1.14.8). I also made a patch to make it compilable while the appropriate fixes are made upstream. It should also compile in a clean chroot.
bReally commented on 2023-03-09 21:31 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-09 21:40 (UTC) by bReally)
Just try this PKGBUILD. It works!
chappjc commented on 2023-02-02 14:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-02 14:51 (UTC) by chappjc)
The 1.14.7-dev branch already seems to have any other fixes, namely:
I don't know why they haven't hit the missing array include though.
gee commented on 2023-02-02 09:00 (UTC)
Thanks for this!
There's a few more patches to create, I'm not sure how many yet but I'm going at it as time permits.
chappjc commented on 2023-02-02 04:45 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-02 04:46 (UTC) by chappjc)
c++ error messages are the
best
jodema commented on 2023-01-28 15:32 (UTC)
Same issue as @Neko-san @gee & @bunkermatty...
bunkermatty commented on 2023-01-28 10:25 (UTC)
The package is broken. Same issue as @Neko-san...
gee commented on 2023-01-24 01:11 (UTC)
@Neko-san Yup same issue here, not sure where the issue is coming from. Maybe I can dig tomorrow. I wonder if this is another case of boost being updated.
Neko-san commented on 2023-01-24 00:27 (UTC)
I don't know when specifically the code for this was introduced, but compiling this throws an error:
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »