Package Details: exercism-bin 3.5.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/exercism-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: exercism-bin
Description: Command line client for exercism.io
Upstream URL: https://github.com/exercism/cli
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: exercism
Provides: exercism
Replaces: exercism-cli
Submitter: linduxed
Maintainer: linduxed (esskayesss)
Last Packager: esskayesss
Votes: 77
Popularity: 0.121352
First Submitted: 2019-07-28 13:36 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-20 15:23 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

linduxed commented on 2016-06-05 12:23 (UTC)

Package updated to v2.2.6.

linduxed commented on 2016-03-05 15:34 (UTC)

Package updated to v2.2.4.

cscorley commented on 2015-12-02 04:26 (UTC)

It seems that the metadata on this package is out-of-date. The PKGBUILD does contain instructions for downloading and installing the latest (currently 2.2.1), while the sources listed on the web are incorrect.

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-12-01 01:46 (UTC)

Installing doesn't seem to work: ``` ~ ❯❯❯ pacaur -S exercism-cli :: Package(s) exercism-cli not found in repositories, trying AUR... :: resolving dependencies... :: looking for inter-conflicts... :: exercism-cli-v2.2.0-1 has been flagged out of date on 2015-10-16 ... ==> Finished making: exercism-cli v2.2.1-1 (Tue Dec 1 12:44:51 AEDT 2015) ==> Cleaning up... :: Installing exercism-cli package(s)... ~ ❯❯❯ pacman -Qs exercism ~ ❯❯❯ ``` I'm afraid I can't contribute to figuring out why this is happening, but happy to post output for anything that folks suggest.

linduxed commented on 2015-04-06 17:19 (UTC)

Updated to v2.0.2.

Melon_Bread commented on 2015-04-03 16:55 (UTC)

v2.0.2 Was released a couple days ago https://github.com/exercism/cli/releases/tag/v2.0.2

linduxed commented on 2015-03-10 14:00 (UTC)

Updated to v2.0.0.

vitoreiji commented on 2015-02-04 14:15 (UTC)

You're right, it seems to have been a problem with my aur helper. Sorry for the noise.

linduxed commented on 2015-02-03 18:05 (UTC)

I just tried downloading the 64-bit tarball and ran `md5sum` on it; I'm getting the same checksum on that file as the PKGBUILD checks for. I don't know what could be causing your problem, but it seems to me that everything is in order.

vitoreiji commented on 2015-02-03 17:57 (UTC)

The hashsums for 64bit are not passing, please update.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »