Search Criteria
Package Details: extcalc 0.9.3_1-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/extcalc.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | extcalc |
Description: | A multifunctional scientific graphic calculator |
Upstream URL: | http://extcalc-linux.sourceforge.net |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | emphire |
Maintainer: | emphire |
Last Packager: | emphire |
Votes: | 28 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2008-12-08 01:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2017-07-02 00:22 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- mesa (mesa-minimal-gitAUR, mesa-gitAUR, mesa-amd-bc250AUR, mesa-wsl2-gitAUR, amdonly-gaming-mesa-gitAUR, mesa-amber)
- qt4AUR
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- gcc (gcc-gitAUR, gccrs-gitAUR, gcc11AUR, gcc-snapshotAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
sirus20x6 commented on 2024-07-03 14:12 (UTC)
doesn't build because Werror=format-security seems to be forced on, editing the pkgbuild to have -Wno-format-security doesn't work anymore
JohnRobson commented on 2023-05-21 19:04 (UTC)
Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2022-11-05 18:57 (UTC)
Please also bump the pkgrel, to build against the updated openssl.
jihem commented on 2022-11-05 16:24 (UTC)
The package does not compile anymore, probably since a recent version of GCC less permissive about security concerns. The simplest fix is to add
-Wno-format-security
in CXXFLAGS.Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2018-07-25 07:34 (UTC) (edited on 2018-07-25 07:38 (UTC) by Ralf_Mardorf)
Basic arithmetic operation returns grotesque value
https://sourceforge.net/p/extcalc-linux/bugs/8/
extcalc returns the correct value for
1040.79+73.41-31.90-388.63-31.57-37.80-92.00-170.50-170.50-72.93-34.18-34.18
it's
50.01
if it calculates
1040.79+73.41-31.90-388.63-31.57-37.80-92.00-170.50-170.50-72.93-34.18-34.18-50.01
extcalc returns
1.11022302462516e-16
instead of
0
$ pacman -Qi extcalc | head -4
Name: extcalc -- Version : 0.9.3_1-4 -- Description: A multifunctional scientific graphic calculator -- Architecture: x86_64
NoSuck commented on 2015-01-21 10:53 (UTC)
benjarobin commented on 2013-05-18 20:20 (UTC)
1 2 Next › Last »