Search Criteria
Package Details: fe 1.2.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/fe.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | fe |
| Description: | AUR helper with a familiar subcommand system |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/baris-inandi/fe |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Submitter: | baris-inandi |
| Maintainer: | baris-inandi |
| Last Packager: | baris-inandi |
| Votes: | 2 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-07-31 21:49 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2022-08-15 19:40 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- bash (bash-gitAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR)
- pacman-contrib (pacman-contrib-gitAUR)
- paruAUR (paru-binAUR, paru-gitAUR, paru-patchAUR)
- sudo (sudo-gitAUR, fudo-gitAUR, run0-sudo-shim-gitAUR, doas-sudo-shim-kAUR, sudo-selinuxAUR, doas-sudo-shimAUR, doas-sudo-shim-gitAUR, run0-sudoAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- go (go-gitAUR, gcc-go-gitAUR, go-binAUR, goup-rsAUR, gcc-go-snapshotAUR, gcc-go) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »
yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-09 18:31 (UTC)
@baris-inandi: I think you meant to bump the pkgver from 1.1.5 to 1.1.6? 0 is not a valid pkgver.
baris-inandi commented on 2022-08-09 18:30 (UTC)
@yochananmarqos
I read the vcs package guidelines and came up with this pkgver():
However, just adding this function does not update the version. I expected
makepkg --printsrcinfo > .SRCINFOto include the latest tag but it shows the version as 0.yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-08 22:59 (UTC)
@baris-inandi: It appears you missed my edit to my previous comment.
yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-01 18:26 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-01 18:28 (UTC) by yochananmarqos)
@a821: Aha! Would you believe I never noticed that? The request is cancelled now.
@baris-inandi: You can use a pkgver() function, see VCS package guidelines.
baris-inandi commented on 2022-08-01 18:00 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-01 18:04 (UTC) by baris-inandi)
Hey, just implemented git tags using
git checkout. I also removed the maintainer variable and replaced it with a comment. (1.0.19)a821 commented on 2022-08-01 17:36 (UTC)
@baris-inandi: As said, the PKGBUILD is much better. Just minor issues
you can easily pin a commit (while you work on the tags) with for example
source=("git+$url#commit=ad5db3d79c4ca66e28b79cdd801e088c8c946b52")the maintainer line should be a bash comment, not a variable, eg,
# Maintainer: your name <your email>(custom variables in the PKGBUILD need an underscore prefix:_foobar="some value")@yochananmarqos: btw, you can reject the deletion request yourself ("Requests" tab) to reduce the load of the TUs :)
yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-01 14:46 (UTC)
@baris-inandi: It's much better now, thanks for working on it. Perhaps I was a little hasty filing the deletion request. The request will be rejected since you resolved the issue.
baris-inandi commented on 2022-08-01 13:22 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-01 13:58 (UTC) by baris-inandi)
Hey @a821, thank you so much for the help, really appreciate it.
Here's what I did (1.0.14):
- Removed all
sudocalls- Added
parutodepends- Removed
bashfrommakedepends- Added the config files to
backup- Changed
licenseto "GPL3"- Now the
PKGBUILDusesinstallproperlyI'll try to use git-tags too so that the naming is also appropriate
a821 commented on 2022-08-01 11:43 (UTC)
The PKGBUILD is extremely bad. Please read carefully the Go package guidelines again (link in first comment). There's even a sample PKGBUILD you can mostly copy and paste.
-gitsuffix, unless you pin a commit or use git-tags.sudoat all.installcommand to install files to$pkgdir, for example 'install -Dm755 my_program "$pkgdir/usr/bin/my_program"`paru.confto/etcthen your package will conflict withparuwhich, I guess, is not what you want.paru, add it to thedependsarray./etc), then add those files to thebackuparray.bashis not required inmakedependsas it is provided bybase-devel(which it is assumed to be installed) viapacmanGPL3(no "v")baris-inandi commented on 2022-07-31 22:38 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-31 22:55 (UTC) by baris-inandi)
Hello, does the PKGBUILD look right now? I'm still calling
sudoforgo buildon the build() function, should sudo be avoided entirely?« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »