Search Criteria
Package Details: fpm 1.16.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/fpm.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | fpm |
Description: | Effing package management! Build packages for multiple platforms (deb, rpm, etc) with great ease and sanity. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm |
Keywords: | deb packaging rpm ruby |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | markzz |
Maintainer: | barbuk |
Last Packager: | barbuk |
Votes: | 14 |
Popularity: | 0.48 |
First Submitted: | 2015-12-06 19:48 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-09 07:44 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- ruby
- ruby-arr-pmAUR
- ruby-backportsAUR
- ruby-cabinAUR
- ruby-clampAUR
- ruby-pleaserunAUR
- ruby-rexml
- ruby-studAUR
- squashfs-tools (squashfs-tools-gitAUR) (optional) – Support for snaps
Required by (2)
- easybuild-framework-git (optional)
- signal-desktop-beta (make, aarch64)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Flammkuchen commented on 2023-09-08 09:44 (UTC)
Please add
squashfs-tools
as optdepend for snaps.fosskers commented on 2021-03-18 23:06 (UTC)
Here's a patch that gets it building again:
markzz commented on 2018-07-04 05:30 (UTC)
rpi2: "arch=(any)"
Yes, it supports armv7 as long as you have all the dependencies installed.
As for your other problem, check the architectures of the package and the operating system. They must match letter by letter.
rpi2 commented on 2018-07-04 02:00 (UTC)
covert deb to pacman success, pacman -U got this error: error: failed to prepare transaction (package architecture is not valid)
does fpm support armv7 architecture? btw, convert on Alarm.
RX14 commented on 2018-04-12 13:02 (UTC)
@Twiki it offers you all the benefits of using the pacman package manager to manage your gems, instead of having to use gem itself. The benefit is that fpm is installed system-wide without having to run gem as root, which I strongly dislike doing.
Twiki commented on 2018-04-11 14:37 (UTC)
What does this offer beyond installing with "gem install --no-ri --no-rdoc fpm" ?
RX14 commented on 2018-01-31 22:43 (UTC)
@pd5rm this seems like a bug in the ruby-archive-tar-minitar package, please report this bug to the correct package!
pd5rm commented on 2018-01-31 22:33 (UTC) (edited on 2018-01-31 22:59 (UTC) by pd5rm)
Sorry for comment spam, dealing with MD comment formatting issues. ;-)
1) Seems to requires 'ruby-rdoc' to be installed for the ruby-archive-tar-minitar package to build.
@RX14 Thanks I'll report to that package.
2) ruby-insist (a package dep) appears to be packaged incorrectly. Follow the workaround provided by user Salamandar on that package.
3) Package seems to run, but getting warnings (not a ruby expert so not sure if important).
RX14 commented on 2017-11-11 15:01 (UTC)
1 2 3 Next › Last »