Fine, I'm disowning the package.
Search Criteria
Package Details: freecad-git 0.22.0.36999.ged77603af9-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/freecad-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | freecad-git |
Description: | A general purpose 3D CAD modeler - git checkout |
Upstream URL: | https://www.freecad.org/ |
Licenses: | LGPL |
Conflicts: | freecad, freecad-appimage, freecad-appimage-git |
Provides: | freecad |
Submitter: | gborzi |
Maintainer: | greyltc (adrianinsaval) |
Last Packager: | adrianinsaval |
Votes: | 107 |
Popularity: | 1.57 |
First Submitted: | 2012-03-03 13:46 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-30 00:29 (UTC) |
Dependencies (39)
- boost-libs
- coin (coin-gitAUR)
- fmt (fmt-gitAUR)
- glew (glew-libepoxyAUR, glew-wayland-gitAUR, glew-gitAUR)
- jsoncpp (jsoncpp-cmake-gitAUR, jsoncpp-cmakeAUR, jsoncpp-gitAUR)
- medAUR (med-openmpi)
- netcdf (netcdf-openmpi)
- opencascade (opencascade-gitAUR)
- openmpi (openmpi-gitAUR)
- pyside6
- pyside6-tools
- python-matplotlib (python-matplotlib-gitAUR)
- python-packaging
- python-pivy
- python-ply
- python-yaml (python-yaml-gitAUR)
- qt6-5compat
- qt6-base (qt6-base-gitAUR, qt6-base-headlessAUR)
- qt6-svg
- qt6-tools
- Show 19 more dependencies...
Required by (4)
- freecad-a2plus-git (requires freecad)
- freecad-cadquery-git (requires freecad)
- freecad-fcgear-git (requires freecad)
- openmc-git (requires freecad)
Sources (1)
gborzi commented on 2013-06-24 04:04 (UTC)
masterkorp commented on 2013-06-23 21:31 (UTC)
I will gladly adopt it
gborzi commented on 2013-06-23 21:09 (UTC)
Hi taotedice,
at the moment I don't have the time to update the package, neither I'm very interested in it. Would you adopt it if I disown?
taotedice commented on 2013-06-23 20:13 (UTC)
Freecad git repos shows it has upgraded to OCC-6.6.0 with rev 376fdb as of 20130525. It also just switched from pyqt to pyside as of 20130621.
gborzi commented on 2013-05-05 15:19 (UTC)
Fixed in the same way used by freecad.
gborzi commented on 2013-05-05 15:00 (UTC)
@masterkorp
freecad git sources isn't (yet) updated to compile with OpenCascade 6.6.0. I think we'll need to wait until they update it.
masterkorp commented on 2013-05-05 14:38 (UTC)
[ 7%] Building CXX object src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/CMakeFiles/StdMeshers.dir/src/StdMeshers/StdMeshers_Regular_1D.cpp.o
[ 7%] Building CXX object src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/CMakeFiles/StdMeshers.dir/src/StdMeshers/StdMeshers_RadialPrism_3D.cpp.o
/tmp/packerbuild-1000/freecad-git/freecad-git/src/free-cad/src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/src/StdMeshers/StdMeshers_RadialPrism_3D.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool StdMeshers_RadialPrism_3D::Compute(SMESH_Mesh&, const TopoDS_Shape&)’:
/tmp/packerbuild-1000/freecad-git/freecad-git/src/free-cad/src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/src/StdMeshers/StdMeshers_RadialPrism_3D.cpp:162:29: error: ‘OuterShell’ is not a member of ‘BRepTools’
TopoDS_Shell outerShell = BRepTools::OuterShell( solid );
^
make[2]: *** [src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/CMakeFiles/StdMeshers.dir/src/StdMeshers/StdMeshers_RadialPrism_3D.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/3rdParty/salomesmesh/CMakeFiles/StdMeshers.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
The build failed.
Is there any known fix for this ?
masterkorp commented on 2013-05-02 11:31 (UTC)
Oh I just noticed now that freecad bin is for the freecad package and freecad-git is for freecad-git package.
masterkorp commented on 2013-05-02 10:36 (UTC)
masterkorp ~ $ freecad
freecad: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_signals.so.1.52.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
masterkorp ~ $ pacman -Qs boost
local/boost 1.53.0-2
Free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries - Development
local/boost-libs 1.53.0-2
Free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries - Runtime
Yes, I've rebuilt freecad after the update. Still getting the error.
Pinned Comments
adrianinsaval commented on 2023-03-12 14:50 (UTC)
If the check fails there is little I can do about it as it most likely needs to be fixed upstream, in such cases report those upstream (maybe wait a day or two as sometimes it's quickly solved upstream) or skip the check with
makepkg --nocheck
if you don't care about the functionality that is being reported as failing in the check.