Package Details: freeoffice 1046-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freeoffice.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freeoffice
Description: A complete, reliable, lightning-fast and Microsoft Office-compatible office suite with a word processor, spreadsheet, and presentation graphics software.
Upstream URL: http://www.freeoffice.com/
Licenses: custom
Submitter: Muflone
Maintainer: Muflone
Last Packager: Muflone
Votes: 55
Popularity: 0.29
First Submitted: 2013-06-12 16:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-06-12 00:47 (UTC)

Latest Comments

philo commented on 2021-10-31 09:32 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-11 14:12 (UTC) by philo)

@dante-evil

No swahili nor 'all upper case' here. Only plain English.

dante-evil commented on 2021-10-23 21:39 (UTC)

BUENAS, BUENAS AMIGOS, AQUI LES DEJO LA VERSION 2021 DE FREEOFFICE , MUY FUNCIONAL LA PUEDEN DESCARGAR AQUI:https://gist.github.com/11486721768043600d2969f68d6ad87a.git

Muflone commented on 2021-02-07 12:27 (UTC)

@saloniamatteo just let me explain how AUR works. Take also a look at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines

1) if a package has an issue, you contact the maintainer or leave a message in the package comments page, along with your workarounds/solutions

2) even if the maintainer will not reply or accept your help, you won't duplicate the package

3) the freeoffice-next package will be anyway deleted right now, as you got notified about the current status

If you want to help in maintaining the freeoffice package, first offer your help, then later I could think about adding you as co-maintainer. Sorry about being so hard but I cannot accept as co-maintainer someone that doesn't respect the basic AUR rules

Muflone commented on 2021-02-06 22:37 (UTC)

@philo good point

@saloniamatteo as explained in the deletion request, please don't submit duplicated packages only for a newer version of an outdated package.

package updated to the version 982-1

philo commented on 2021-02-06 10:50 (UTC)

Does not make sense to have 2 packages for the same program. Can't their respective maintainers collaborate ?

saloniamatteo commented on 2020-12-12 06:42 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-12 07:58 (UTC) by saloniamatteo)

For anyone that wants to download the latest version, you can install my package freeoffice-next, it is more updated.

rarmas commented on 2020-11-17 05:14 (UTC)

ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

sticsk commented on 2020-09-15 19:42 (UTC)

Yeah looks like the AUR is outdated, just get the software from freeoffice official website, it's a tarball there with a script that installs the thing locally

rayzorben commented on 2020-09-14 20:42 (UTC) (edited on 2020-09-14 20:42 (UTC) by rayzorben)

pkgver=978
sha256=1b18ea29ad12642688227cdca51738369513626070f2841c22d2fb35c38eadb0

jedrzejowski commented on 2020-05-14 19:06 (UTC)

Hi, to anybody struggles with missing icons on dock on Gnome, I found solution here.

Fast copy paste:

sudo bash -c "echo StartupWMClass=pm >> /usr/share/applications/freeoffice-planmaker.desktop"
sudo bash -c "echo StartupWMClass=pr >> /usr/share/applications/freeoffice-presentations.desktop"
sudo bash -c "echo StartupWMClass=tm >> /usr/share/applications/freeoffice-textmaker.desktop"

@Muflone, Could you add these lines after install command with *.desktop files?

echo StartupWMClass=tm >> "${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/${pkgname}-textmaker.desktop"
echo StartupWMClass=pm >> "${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/${pkgname}-planmaker.desktop"
echo StartupWMClass=pr >> "${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/${pkgname}-presentations.desktop"

Muflone commented on 2020-04-04 22:49 (UTC)

Package updated to version 976-1

grmume commented on 2020-04-04 15:14 (UTC)

Same error. Integrity failed for softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64. The correct checksum is 74eabf718d7cdc8a0b6a0ec7938cdaeef2577c8d886f9489c36d4d853d25d08f.

Zeitgeist-J commented on 2020-04-03 14:43 (UTC)

Same error today .. softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64.tgz ... FAILED ... ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

DaleYYC commented on 2020-04-02 01:26 (UTC)

... softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64.tgz ... FAILED ... ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

m31aur commented on 2020-03-27 06:31 (UTC)

974.1 will not build with the following Validating source files with sha256sums... softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64.tgz ... FAILED freeoffice-textmaker ... Passed freeoffice-planmaker ... Passed freeoffice-presentations ... Passed freeoffice-textmaker.desktop ... Passed freeoffice-planmaker.desktop ... Passed freeoffice-presentations.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Failed to build freeoffice

themoosemachine commented on 2020-03-26 10:12 (UTC)

I get the following error during installation:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64.tgz ... FAILED

dbarbosa0 commented on 2020-02-26 12:01 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-26 12:01 (UTC) by dbarbosa0)

@Muflone, the software was updated. sha256: e26659679c7eca0fd81f4ad354e01170f2f3cbda9f9f0a6faa617b5c7118e17c softmaker-freeoffice-974-amd64.tgz Thanks.

philo commented on 2019-12-07 11:24 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks.

Muflone commented on 2019-12-05 15:32 (UTC)

@philo clean your installation directory, you have a dangling freeoffice2018.tar file

philo commented on 2019-12-03 20:00 (UTC) (edited on 2019-12-04 20:15 (UTC) by philo)

Trying to install (upgrade) with aurutils failed:

==> Extracting sources... -> Extracting softmaker-freeoffice-973-amd64.tgz with bsdtar ==> Starting prepare()... xz: freeoffice2018.tar: File exists ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare(). Aborting...

EDIT-So I removed freeoffice 971 and then installed 973 successfully (with aurutils). Side effect:I had to give an e-mail address to get a free product key.

happyreacer commented on 2019-10-09 07:24 (UTC)

i like this userfrindly software

philo commented on 2019-09-21 16:19 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-21 18:09 (UTC) by philo)

softmaker.net now offers:

https://www.softmaker.net/down/softmaker-freeoffice-971-amd64.tgz

P.S. - Thanks!

jose1711 commented on 2019-09-21 08:25 (UTC)

looks like it needs sum update

xoan commented on 2019-09-12 18:26 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-12 18:27 (UTC) by xoan)

@axil42 2019-09-05: Revision 970 https://www.freeoffice.com/en/download/servicepacks

axil42 commented on 2019-08-26 16:36 (UTC)

Why is this flagged out-of-date? 966 seems to be the latest version, and I see the checksum issue is fixed.

geosam commented on 2019-07-14 21:15 (UTC)

Update with:

https://gist.github.com/samtux/65f7cf966b0293041739d27d5fd19cec

michaldybczak commented on 2019-01-04 15:06 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-04 15:12 (UTC) by michaldybczak)

Please correct the checksums: :: failed to verify integrity or prepare freeoffice package

To install it I had to skip verification, so all who what to build it now just edit PKGBUILD and replace the first sha256sum with SKIP

sha256sums=('SKIP'

Muflone commented on 2018-12-26 16:07 (UTC) (edited on 2018-12-26 16:07 (UTC) by Muflone)

Package updated to version 944. Version 945 seems only for MACs

Dmitry173ul commented on 2018-12-19 15:27 (UTC)

Please, update the package checksums! I can't to build your package.

littlejones commented on 2018-12-17 06:31 (UTC)

Please update! It's not installing

stef204 commented on 2018-10-23 10:59 (UTC) (edited on 2018-10-23 11:27 (UTC) by stef204)

@Muflone
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... softmaker-freeoffice-934-amd64.tgz ... FAILED
Can you please amend the PKGBUILD to provide the proper sha256sum for the softmaker-freeoffice-934-amd64.tgz file?
If not, perhaps updating to latest version (938?), with correct sha256sums? Thanks.

micman commented on 2018-10-17 10:58 (UTC)

@vorbote OK.

toropisco commented on 2018-10-16 16:01 (UTC)

There is a service pack with version number 938. See https://www.freeoffice.com/en/support/version-history for details.

@micman familiarize yourself with the contents of pacman-contrib and the PKGBUILD man page. Your problem is trivial.

micman commented on 2018-10-13 00:22 (UTC) (edited on 2018-10-13 00:23 (UTC) by micman)

It's not possible to install the package for some validity check problem. I tried to install it by yaourtix, and after the failure with makepkg --skippgpcheck. Here's the result:

==> Making package: freeoffice 934-1 (Sat 13 Oct 2018 02:13:28 AM CEST) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found softmaker-freeoffice-934-amd64.tgz -> Found freeoffice-textmaker -> Found freeoffice-planmaker -> Found freeoffice-presentations -> Found freeoffice-textmaker.desktop -> Found freeoffice-planmaker.desktop -> Found freeoffice-presentations.desktop ==> WARNING: Skipping verification of source file PGP signatures. ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... softmaker-freeoffice-934-amd64.tgz ... FAILED freeoffice-textmaker ... Passed freeoffice-planmaker ... Passed freeoffice-presentations ... Passed freeoffice-textmaker.desktop ... Passed freeoffice-planmaker.desktop ... Passed freeoffice-presentations.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

copecu commented on 2018-10-12 08:28 (UTC)

==> Validando los archivos source con sha256sums... softmaker-freeoffice-934-amd64.tgz ... HA FALLADO

mozzi32 commented on 2018-07-21 23:37 (UTC)

Version 934 is out.Can you update please ? Thanks

marvin commented on 2018-07-02 11:47 (UTC)

Revision 934 has appeared. Thank you for updating in advance.

galvez_65 commented on 2018-05-20 19:08 (UTC)

Thank you

Muflone commented on 2018-05-20 17:02 (UTC)

package updated to version 631 for 64 bit only

galvez_65 commented on 2018-05-19 01:06 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-19 03:20 (UTC) by galvez_65)

I looked at the 64 bit deb freeoffice and it no longer looks like the 32bit libs are required and should be replaced with their 64bit counterparts.

I edited the dependencies. it looks like the package builds and installs with the edited dependencies. The PKGBUILD is here https://hastebin.com/ipuhihewap.bash

kgleason commented on 2018-05-18 12:52 (UTC)

The PKGBUILD from unixfox doesn't work if I try to use it with yaourt, but it works when I makepkg -s.

unixfox commented on 2018-05-17 09:09 (UTC)

PKGBUILD for the new version (2018): https://hastebin.com/ukegikuxeg.bash

getaceres commented on 2018-05-17 09:02 (UTC)

Is this AUR still supported? A new version is out http://www.softmaker.net/down/softmaker-freeoffice-931-amd64.tgz

satriani commented on 2016-12-15 16:25 (UTC)

http://www.softmaker.net/down/softmaker-freeoffice-763.tgz Please update

Muflone commented on 2016-04-23 23:50 (UTC)

Package updated

hachel commented on 2016-04-20 09:31 (UTC)

lib32-libxrandr is an additional dependency on 64Bit systems, otherwise it will complain on startup about a missing libXrandr.so.2

Muflone commented on 2015-02-07 15:28 (UTC)

Package updated

m110s commented on 2015-01-30 23:31 (UTC)

Version 698 is available, please update.

Muflone commented on 2015-01-10 15:37 (UTC)

@Alister.Hood unfortunately it was my fault, now it was fixed. Thanks for reporting it.

Alister.Hood commented on 2015-01-08 20:49 (UTC)

Planmaker is labelled in my menu as "Freeoffice Textmaker". I guess this is an upstream bug, but maybe we should patch it.

Muflone commented on 2014-12-25 10:18 (UTC)

Package updated to version 697

eikoninaru commented on 2014-12-23 23:53 (UTC)

FreeOffice 697 is available.

killermoehre commented on 2014-12-08 11:35 (UTC)

FreeOffice 696 is available.

Muflone commented on 2014-09-30 15:15 (UTC)

@Voice this package provides SoftMaker FreeOffice, not Office 2012. the latest available version for Software FreeOffice is 690

Voice commented on 2014-09-23 00:19 (UTC)

http://www.softmaker.com/english/servofl12_en.htm The current revision of SoftMaker Office 2012 for Linux carries the revision number 691

Muflone commented on 2013-06-13 19:46 (UTC)

for future references: unfortunately both tar.gz, rpm and deb packages contain only 32 bit binaries, neither source code nor 64 bit binaries are available at all in any form.

toropisco commented on 2013-06-13 12:55 (UTC)

Forget about it. I didn't examine the other packages before making my comment. (I had forgotten I had installed it while having multilib enabled a while ago).

toropisco commented on 2013-06-13 12:39 (UTC)

Have you considered using either the deb or RPM packages? There are native x86_64 binaries if you go that route. You could use the google-chrome-{stable,beta,dev} packaging as examples of how to do that.

Muflone commented on 2013-06-12 16:31 (UTC)

First package release with build revision 676