Search Criteria
Package Details: glibc-eac-locales 2.40-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/glibc-eac.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | glibc-eac |
Description: | Pregenerated locales for GNU C Library |
Upstream URL: | https://www.gnu.org/software/libc |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later, LGPL-2.1-or-later |
Conflicts: | glibc-locales |
Provides: | glibc-locales |
Submitter: | MacTavishAO |
Maintainer: | MacTavishAO |
Last Packager: | MacTavishAO |
Votes: | 13 |
Popularity: | 0.098046 |
First Submitted: | 2024-02-07 00:41 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-07-25 05:04 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- glibc-eacAUR
- gd (gd-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- lib32-gcc-libs (lib32-gcc-libs-gitAUR, lib32-gccrs-libs-gitAUR, lib32-gcc-libs-snapshotAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
Required by (2)
- accountsservice-git (requires glibc-locales) (check)
- yocto-nanbield-meta (requires glibc-locales)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
conan-cimmerian commented on 2024-11-02 02:49 (UTC)
How do I replace system glibc with this? using yay to install this gives an irresolvable package, deleting and replacing breaks the system preventing any further updates unless you go into a live environment and run pacstrap again. It successfully builds from the PKGBUILD but it won't install due to the aformentioned conflict.
014 commented on 2024-10-01 22:53 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-01 22:53 (UTC) by 014)
Even though I see 'export' commands for gcc and g++ in specific areas, the build will not run for me (using Clang by default) unless I add the gcc and g++ export commands towards the top of the PKGBUILD file.
bmirtsching commented on 2024-07-27 00:43 (UTC)
I used glibc-eac from here just now, not from Garuda Linux one--Insurgency Sandstorm works! I did not know about glibc-dthash, but nice to know! Is it my understanding that the glibc-dthash would have simply updated the base glibc to function as this one? Thanks to xiota, Eric-dev and MacTavishAO!
MacTavishAO commented on 2024-07-25 05:10 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-25 05:37 (UTC) by MacTavishAO)
Updated. Sorry for the delay. There was an issue with my email client.
eric-dev commented on 2024-07-25 02:30 (UTC)
@bmirtsching The jump from 2.39 to 2.40 is a minor update, so the risk is lower. If there was a major downgrade that could be bad (e.g. version 3.X to version 2.X). Most software follows these guidelines for versions: https://semver.org/
I reverted back to 2.40 and I could not play insurgency sandstorm. Then I reinstalled this AUR package and I could play again.
If you are truly concerned, research the applications you care about and see if they have a glibc dependency. 2.40 is pretty new according to these release notes, so it is unlikely many of your applications will depend on
2.40
. If many of your applications / libs have a min dependency of (>=2.40) for glibc, then downgrading would break it.1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »