Package Details: icinga2 2.14.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/icinga2.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: icinga2
Description: An open source host, service and network monitoring program
Upstream URL: https://icinga.com/
Licenses: GPL
Replaces: icinga2-common
Submitter: bebehei
Maintainer: julianbrost
Last Packager: julianbrost
Votes: 40
Popularity: 0.45
First Submitted: 2014-06-23 01:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-09 19:56 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 15 Next › Last »

Acema commented on 2021-08-04 12:24 (UTC)

I use a Vim3 to monitor my home IT. Could you please support aarch64. I can support if you need any help for testing.

julianbrost commented on 2021-06-07 19:55 (UTC)

@Luxii These packages are part of the base-devel package group, which is assumed to be installed when building packages.

ArthurBorsboom commented on 2021-06-07 19:55 (UTC)

I believe they should not be added as dependencies.

bison and flex are part of the base-devel group.

The group base-devel is assumed to be already installed when building with makepkg. Members of this group should not be included in makedepends array.

Source: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD

Luxii commented on 2021-06-07 19:46 (UTC)

Hey,

I needed to install the packages bison and flex to get icinga2 to compile.

Maybe we should add this to the dependencies.

bldewolf commented on 2020-12-16 01:19 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-16 01:20 (UTC) by bldewolf)

Hey, tried to build this today. Looks like the pull request authors for the boost build fixes force pushed their pull requests to be different. The checksums don't match and the new patches don't apply. I assume this means they'll be merged soon, but for the interim I had to update my PKGBUILD to use the raw commits of the old patches like so (pulled the commit ids from the pull request pages):

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 5a10344..6d41c17 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -45,14 +45,14 @@ install='icinga2.install'
 changelog="icinga2.changelog"
 source=("https://github.com/Icinga/$pkgname/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz"
         'https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/Icinga/icinga2/pull/8184.patch'
-        'https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/Icinga/icinga2/pull/8190.patch'
-        'https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/Icinga/icinga2/pull/8191.patch'
+        'https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/commit/7e62a68eadada58e762d3f4261750796adffd440.diff'
+        'https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/commit/45dd71e0f9a93369e08d6cb26f97940f9c9594aa.diff'
         "$pkgname.tmpfiles"
         "$pkgname.sysusers")
 sha256sums=('56387d5e047df04fd91fdb8db3124eb09325c7377fbcaa11ef063147db816dfb'
             'dc1a2530d1c2c311826443cebaaa3c307f400e6a995414c654f4e6b94ec8b885'
-            '4f033a9a1bf74fe81eeda553e8d249ddc30fbb7c09a7edb37c3ce6dbad332958'
-            'ec60024196c381debb6caa759f5d8e1750f5039f5b3689d822009643da6fd6cb'
+            '52e50af7b10d75fcd6257fbf9b3c9043efb3cc497fac0970656fbffb1d328ee5'
+            '1fa4c67f2f1bbed9814441d370ed50484bf64e57d16fddbbf5a0be8da9c7f1a2'
             '1302b333f49ead14f8808a379535971501d3a0c1ba02a7bf7b4406b7d27c754c'
             '2f946a33ea50a3c4400a81acd778e6411ffe5e2257a98004288b84a64f382810')

@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ prepare() {
   cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"

   patch -p1 < "$srcdir/8184.patch"
-  patch -p1 < "$srcdir/8190.patch"
-  patch -p1 < "$srcdir/8191.patch"
+  patch -p1 < "$srcdir/7e62a68eadada58e762d3f4261750796adffd440.diff"
+  patch -p1 < "$srcdir/45dd71e0f9a93369e08d6cb26f97940f9c9594aa.diff"
 }

 build() {

wuestengecko commented on 2020-11-20 18:05 (UTC)

@ArthurBorsboom: If you have a machine with matching architecture and enough RAM, just build there and push over the binary package. Otherwise, take a look at https://icinga.com/docs/icinga2/latest/doc/21-development/#build-optimization.

ArthurBorsboom commented on 2020-11-20 17:59 (UTC)

I noticed there are downloadable packages for other distributions.

https://icinga.com/download/

Sometimes I see community or AUR packages which use these type of packages to create an Arch package.

Would that be an option? Or do you have a preference for the git repository?

julianbrost commented on 2020-11-20 17:38 (UTC)

If nobody replies, probably nobody knows. I can only tell you that I don't provide a repo with binary packages somewhere.

ArthurBorsboom commented on 2020-11-20 15:25 (UTC)

Ping

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 15 Next › Last »