Package Details: icinga2 2.14.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/icinga2.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: icinga2
Description: An open source host, service and network monitoring program
Upstream URL: https://icinga.com/
Licenses: GPL
Replaces: icinga2-common
Submitter: bebehei
Maintainer: julianbrost
Last Packager: julianbrost
Votes: 40
Popularity: 0.44
First Submitted: 2014-06-23 01:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-09 19:56 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last »

issa commented on 2015-01-10 10:33 (UTC)

Hey, I tried to built it on my raspberry pi. (needed ext. HDD + Swapfile) But sadly it seems to be one of packages that need special treatment as stated here: http://allanmcrae.com/2014/12/pacman-4-2-released/. Unfortunately I don't have sufficient knowledge to change the settings to rebuilt it myself and changing PKGBUILT and/or icinga2.install is not sufficient (as I can't find "/sbin" anywhere in those files). I tried extracting and manually changing "/usr/sbin/" to "/usr/bin" but as I can't update .MTREE pacman will not let me install it (and I think this is for a good reason). So maybe someone can help me out by telling me how to change the settings to rebuilt it (partially or completely).

bebehei commented on 2014-12-29 01:01 (UTC)

icinga updated to v2.2.2

bebehei commented on 2014-10-27 11:09 (UTC)

Sorry, the PKGBUILD has got an error. change the line _tmp_build_dir=`mktemp -dp $srcdir` to export _tmp_build_dir=`mktemp -dp $srcdir` then all should run fine. Sorry for the inconvenience, I can't fix this right now by uploading a new one, i'm on vacancies.

RubenKelevra commented on 2014-10-27 09:31 (UTC)

Sadly I can't build it on my machine: ==> Betrete fakeroot Umgebung... ==> Beginne package()... make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Schluss. ==> FEHLER: Ein Fehler geschah in package(). Breche ab ... ==> FEHLER:Makepkg konnte icinga2 nicht erstellen.

nutz commented on 2014-09-16 09:06 (UTC)

I think you're right, icinga2 runs with boost-libs (and w/o boost) as well.

bebehei commented on 2014-09-12 19:47 (UTC)

... and pacman -Ss boost says: extra/boost 1.56.0-1 [installed] Free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries - development headers extra/boost-libs 1.56.0-1 [installed] Free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries - runtime libraries ... to be continued. Sry for maybe the incorrect dependency-handling. The next days I've got no time to test this. If you could investigate further, It would be great.

bebehei commented on 2014-09-12 19:38 (UTC)

The INSTALL-file says: * Boost library and header files (boost-devel on RHEL, libboost-all-dev on Debian) TBH. I've never heard a difference between boost and boost-libs.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last »