Package Details: ipfs-desktop 0.41.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ipfs-desktop.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ipfs-desktop
Description: Desktop client for the InterPlanetary File System
Upstream URL: https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-desktop
Keywords: filesharing p2p web3
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: alex.henrie
Maintainer: RubenKelevra
Last Packager: RubenKelevra
Votes: 21
Popularity: 0.031077
First Submitted: 2019-10-17 03:19 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-14 16:18 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

RubenKelevra commented on 2025-02-14 16:19 (UTC)

Version 0.41.2 contains both fixes now.

RubenKelevra commented on 2025-02-13 18:05 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-13 18:07 (UTC) by RubenKelevra)

There's a delay in providing the current update due to kubo 0.33.0 and 0.33.1 having two seperate issues.

0.33.2 will be released soon and the desktop version containing it will be the version I update the AUR package to.

More information: https://github.com/ipfs/kubo/issues/10580

RubenKelevra commented on 2023-03-24 15:53 (UTC)

Version 0.27.0 seems to work again with the outdated npm Arch Linux currently provides.

So I removed the dependency for the newer version.

LMK if you run into any trouble, thanks!

RubenKelevra commented on 2023-03-24 15:51 (UTC)

@Jtm-lis an AppImage does not need system dependencies.

Jtm-lis commented on 2023-03-21 01:29 (UTC)

Works with paru -S ipfs-desktop-appimage

RubenKelevra commented on 2023-02-13 15:25 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-13 15:26 (UTC) by RubenKelevra)

The Version 0.26.1 can currently not be compiled since the official package for npm is outdated for a couple of months.

My request doing maybe orphaning/reassigning a different maintainer to the package was closed, because

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated [...]

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!

I've requested a reopen:

That's not an out of date notification - this was done via the flagging option 7 months ago.

That's an orphan request.

If that's not the right place to do such requests, let me know. Otherwise, please reopen.

This request was denied. The Reason for denial:-field was not filled.

The ticket: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/77461

In conclusion, we just have to wait until anything happens in this regard. This package will get continuous upgrades, which will likely be unbuildable as well.

euonymos commented on 2023-02-04 15:52 (UTC)

Thank you!

RubenKelevra commented on 2023-02-04 10:10 (UTC)

@euonymos @DeedleFake

Alright, so the issue was: There was a 0.26.0 release which was deleted and then a re-release with the same version number.

The checksum I published was made with the source code archive for the older release.

Sorry for any confusion here.

Updating should work fine now.

euonymos commented on 2023-02-03 20:37 (UTC)

Please post a short update once it's done. Thanks!

RubenKelevra commented on 2023-02-01 22:33 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-01 22:37 (UTC) by RubenKelevra)

@DeedleFake That's weird. I fetched the file at the time of the update and to calculate the checksum...

So the file seems to have changed since I released the package here.

I'll look into this tomorrow.

Please do not create the package without a valid checksum check, as you may have received a forged file.

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »