Package Details: iridium-rpm 111.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: iridium-rpm
Description: Iridium browser - rhel/centos build altered for arch
Upstream URL:
Licenses: BSD
Conflicts: chromium, iridium
Provides: iridium
Submitter: necklace
Maintainer: necklace
Last Packager: necklace
Votes: 20
Popularity: 1.47
First Submitted: 2020-01-27 21:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-03-20 08:18 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

necklace commented on 2023-03-08 08:28 (UTC)

@lupo2010, Yeah I noticed that as well, not much I can do about it. The url says 110 though, so maybe they forgot to change the version when they built and released the new package - or something like that. You could try reporting it upstream and see if they'll fix it.

lupo2010 commented on 2023-03-06 19:44 (UTC)

Mm... In settings ---> about the browser I have : Version 2023.01.109.0 not 2023.02.110-1 ?

lupo2010 commented on 2022-11-25 21:30 (UTC)

Hello, I find this version (107) slow especially with youtube. Is anyone have the same issue ? (I'm on manjaro)

DrJ commented on 2022-06-06 08:04 (UTC)

@necklace: Works now smoothly ... thank you!

DrJ commented on 2022-06-05 09:46 (UTC)

Remark to all users: The name of the executable has changed from iridium to iridium-browser in the latest package. Be sure to update your way of starting up iridium.

DrJ commented on 2022-06-05 09:41 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-05 10:27 (UTC) by DrJ)


Yes, I do have 64bit. I am under Archlinux updated to the latest with reference to the official repos ... i.e. I have glibc 2.35:

$ pacman -Ss glibc
core/glibc 2.35-5 [installed]
    GNU C Library
core/lib32-glibc 2.35-5 [installed]
    GNU C Library (32-bit)

The rpm 100.0-1.el8 works fine for me, i.e. starts up. ;) Just to make sure, the package I downloaded and used has sha256sum 9c280fd7f77f5afc0300d61fdc3c087b7e8b8075bfc25e49470631dadde8f44c

I don't know if other users encounter the problem described below, too ... but I'd suggest using the el8 version in the package.


necklace commented on 2022-06-04 20:44 (UTC)

@Drj What distro are you on? I'm assuming you have a 64-bit cpu, so I guess you're on an older glibc version or something?

If you can confirm that works on your system (it works on mine) by modifying the pkgbuild we could change to that instead, I also see I made a mistake in the version, it's 100 not 102..

DrJ commented on 2022-06-04 20:21 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-04 20:29 (UTC) by DrJ)

With the latest version (102.0-1) I get /usr/lib64/iridium-browser/iridium-browser: CPU ISA level is lower than required I fear this needs to be adressed at compile time, i.e. no workaround.

necklace commented on 2022-05-25 13:57 (UTC)

Hi @kostadinnm, that's really weird as it works for me™.

Likely something has been cached on your side - try clearing your cache. You'll have to look up how to do that as I don't know which AUR helper you are using.

If that doesn't work then git clone this package and try building manually with makepkg.

kostadinnm commented on 2022-05-24 06:56 (UTC)

Hello. I've been using iridium on my manjaro workstation for quite some time. But it fails to update due to validity check:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    iridium-browser-2021.12.96.0-bp153.1636.1.x86_64.rpm ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error downloading sources: iridium-rpm 
     context: exit status 1