JDK11 is already available.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jdk-doc 22.0.1-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jdk |
| Description: | Oracle Java documentation |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
| Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
| Submitter: | td123 |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 1086 |
| Popularity: | 0.190041 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-26 00:51 (UTC) |
gonciarz commented on 2018-09-26 11:56 (UTC)
Det commented on 2018-07-18 14:27 (UTC)
Whoops, sorry, fixed.
nslxndr commented on 2018-07-18 12:59 (UTC) (edited on 2018-07-18 12:59 (UTC) by nslxndr)
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... jdk-10.0.2_doc-all.zip ... FAILED LICENSE-Oracle-Legal-Notices.txt ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
rellieberman commented on 2018-07-15 21:49 (UTC) (edited on 2018-07-15 21:53 (UTC) by rellieberman)
There is an issue using java webstart from this package when icedtea-web is installed, as both provide javaws. javaws from this package is added and removed from PATH via archlinux-java, while icedtea-web installs itself to /bin and becomes the default. Even when selecting java-10-jre/jre as default, javaws launches icedtea and no jre10's java webstart.
Det commented on 2018-04-17 18:07 (UTC)
Sort of seems like your $startdir has old files in it.
grinderz commented on 2018-04-17 12:53 (UTC) (edited on 2018-04-17 12:56 (UTC) by grinderz)
'/usr/lib/jvm/java-${VERSION}-jre/jre' is not a valid Java environment path
:: archlinux-java: JRE ('java-${VERSION}-jre/jre') set as default Java environment.
bash: java: command not found
correct is
$ archlinux-java set java-10-jre/jre
Det commented on 2018-04-14 18:20 (UTC) (edited on 2018-04-14 18:22 (UTC) by Det)
There won't be a JRE 11, since the JDK directory structure was simplified in Java 9 (jre/ merged with rest of JDK, etc.), and a separate product seems to have become obsolete: http://jdk.java.net/11/ (first Note).
Det commented on 2018-04-01 18:29 (UTC)
No need to really post the link on all my packages. I get a notification each time.
pschichtel commented on 2018-04-01 18:26 (UTC)
Det commented on 2018-03-27 19:32 (UTC)
JDK & JRE go side by side again, by the way. Might not make sense, but it's an option.
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.