No, 181 is the build number.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jdk-doc 22.0.1-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jdk |
| Description: | Oracle Java documentation |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
| Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
| Submitter: | td123 |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 1086 |
| Popularity: | 0.145833 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-26 00:51 (UTC) |
Det commented on 2017-09-23 19:25 (UTC)
coderkun commented on 2017-09-23 19:22 (UTC)
Shoudn’t be the version 9.u181?
Det commented on 2017-09-23 03:57 (UTC)
Done.
mirbeksm commented on 2017-09-23 02:13 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-23 02:17 (UTC) by mirbeksm)
Comparing PKGBUILD files for "aur/jdk-docs"@9u0-2 and "aur/jdk8-docs"@8u144-1
source array: add 'LICENSE-Oracle-Legal-Notices.txt'
md5sums array: add md5sum value of 'LICENSE-Oracle-Legal-Notices.txt'
So they look like this:
source=("http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/${_major}+${_build}/jdk-${_major}_doc-all.zip"
'LICENSE-Oracle-Legal-Notices.txt')
md5sums=('226081b7beb1ac91c3d5037e05522bc6'
'f7f540e6cc3ff25f0a393ece9128ee6c')
Then build succeeds.
mkoskar commented on 2017-09-22 22:07 (UTC)
==> Starting package()...
install: cannot stat 'LICENSE-Oracle-Legal-Notices.txt': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
Det commented on 2017-09-22 20:50 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean?
0 ✓ 23:49:08 ~/Downloads
$ pql jdk | grep jshell
jdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-jdk/bin/jshell
jdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-jdk/jmods/jdk.jshell.jmod
jdk /usr/share/licenses/java9-jdk/legal/jdk.jshell/
jdk /usr/share/licenses/java9-jdk/legal/jdk.jshell/COPYRIGHT
jdk /usr/share/licenses/java9-jdk/legal/jdk.jshell/LICENSE
0 ✓ 23:49:12 ~/Downloads
$ jshell
| Welcome to JShell -- Version 9
| For an introduction type: /help intro
jshell>
What's your archlinux-java status?
NyxCode commented on 2017-09-22 20:30 (UTC)
What's up with JShell? Why isn't it included in this package?
mlelansky commented on 2017-09-22 12:52 (UTC)
Hi! Has got:
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
jdk-9_doc-all.zip ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
:: failed to verify jdk-docs integrity
Det commented on 2017-09-22 07:32 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-22 07:33 (UTC) by Det)
Oh. That's cool. Finally.
I'd wanna be super sure tho. Cuz if I "update" to "9" and then they still dub new one a "9u7"...
E: "java -version" just says:
java version "9"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9+181)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9+181, mixed mode)
BOHverkill commented on 2017-09-22 07:29 (UTC)
AFAICT there is now a new (semantic) versioning scheme. It's 9.0.0 not 9u0.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/install/version-string-format.htm
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.