Problem with the actual PKGBUILD. (javafx-docs 8u74-2)
For the javafx-docs Split-Package.
==> Starting package_javafx-docs()...
install: the stat call for "LICENSE-JavaFX" is not posible: File or Directory not found.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jdk |
Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | jdk |
Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
Submitter: | td123 |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 1086 |
Popularity: | 0.129619 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1729)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1709 more...
Sources (9)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 .. 81 Next › Last »
twphoenix1982 commented on 2016-02-06 10:10 (UTC)
Marcel_K commented on 2015-12-24 01:43 (UTC)
I stand corrected. And I know the previous ABI is still supported, but in the future this package should indeed correct the issue, not Oracle.
Det commented on 2015-12-23 23:30 (UTC)
You seem a little confused when you say that. I somehow missed that before, but these binaries are provided for whatever dependencies Oracle themselves chooses, that is, the ones in the widest circulation (used by Ubuntu).
So, if you're to rebuild your product for every new major dependency release, you're essentially dropping support for any distribution that uses the old version. Unlike things like libpng and libjpeg, GCC actually still provides the previous ABI (as per the announcment), and even if they were to drop it, it would be up to an AUR package to provide it for our distribution.
Marcel_K commented on 2015-12-12 19:48 (UTC)
According to the script in [1] the binaries should be recompiled. However, this package relies on precompiled binaries. Should this be escalated to Oracle or …?
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/news/c-abi-change/
Det commented on 2015-10-13 15:43 (UTC) (edited on 2015-11-19 19:32 (UTC) by Det)
Maybe.
It wouldn't take much effort to add the sources, etc., but I'm not interested in introducing any complicated ARM-specific hacks in the build.
E: There's also a separate package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdk-arm
xdqi commented on 2015-10-12 15:24 (UTC)
Is there possible to add support for ARM architecture (a.k.a ArchARM).
Oracle provides JDK that runs on armv6h, armv7h and armv8h.
FadeMind commented on 2015-08-19 06:10 (UTC)
Values for 8u60-1 release
pkgname=jre
_major=8
_minor=60
_build=b27
md5sums_i686=('51512cfe055125570b5215a48a553d83')
md5sums_x86_64=('e6e44f44b67c1a412f06694c9c30b77f')
Det commented on 2015-07-18 18:40 (UTC)
Our own OpenJDK already includes this, so why not ('local_policy.jar' and 'US_export_policy.jar' in /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk/jre/lib/security/). It's apparently not included in Oracle JDK for legal reasons:
- https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/jre8-openjdk-headless/files/
- http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/jce-policy.html
veeti commented on 2015-07-17 17:25 (UTC)
Could you consider adding the unlimited crypto strength policies (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce8-download-2133166.html) to this package? They provide access to important ciphers like 256-bit AES and are required for some applications. I dare say that upstream is just plain wrong still shipping this separately in 2015, and this would be the responsible thing to do.
Det commented on 2015-07-11 07:53 (UTC)
You can, because the description "Oracle Java Development Kit" mentions it: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=nd&K=java&outdated=&SB=v&SO=d&PP=250&do_Search=Go
I've been meaning to ask this, seeing how you typo some words, do you have a dyslexia?
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.